Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Source. Every figure on this page is computed from the study records in our library when the page loads. It uses the number of participants each record states, and the study design the score reads from the record and from PubMed's publication types. 9,360 of the 27,380 records (34.2%) carry a participant count; the rest are not counted here.

The count is whatever the summary pipeline extracted from the paper. For a meta-analysis it is usually the pooled total; for a registry study it may be the whole registry. It is a size, not a quality.

How studies are distributed by size

Studies by participant count: 1 to 50 1,936; 51 to 100 1,095; 101 to 500 2,710; 501 to 1,000 945; 1,001 to 10,000 1,751; 10,001 to 100,000 549; more than 100,000 374 1 to 50 1,936 1,936 studies (20.7%) 51 to 100 1,095 1,095 studies (11.7%) 101 to 500 2,710 2,710 studies (29.0%) 501 to 1,000 945 945 studies (10.1%) 1,001 to 10,000 1,751 1,751 studies (18.7%) 10,001 to 100,000 549 549 studies (5.9%) more than 100,000 374 374 studies (4.0%)

Number of studies in each size band, out of the 9,360 with a recorded count. The bands are unequal on purpose: they follow the orders of magnitude the field actually works at.

Size by study design

Median participants by study design: Meta-analysis or systematic review 1,687; Cohort or longitudinal study 619.5; Cross-sectional study 294; Case-control study 258.5; No design recorded 167; Randomised or phase 2/3 trial 147 Meta-analysis or systematic review 1,687 631 studies; quartiles 193 to 11,134 Cohort or longitudinal study 619.5 1,952 studies; quartiles 154 to 3,371 Cross-sectional study 294 820 studies; quartiles 97 to 1,095 Case-control study 258.5 168 studies; quartiles 92 to 1,349 No design recorded 167 4,926 studies; quartiles 47 to 820 Randomised or phase 2/3 trial 147 861 studies; quartiles 54 to 462

Median participant count for each design group with at least 20 studies, with the interquartile range under each bar. A study is grouped by the higher-ranked of its recorded design and its PubMed publication type, the same rule the score uses.

The order is the point. Reviews and meta-analyses pool other studies, so their counts are the largest. Cohort studies follow thousands of people for years. Randomised trials, the design that can show cause and effect, are in the middle of the range: a trial has to recruit, treat and follow every participant, which is expensive, so most are far smaller than the observational studies around them. The smallest medians belong to cross-sectional and case-control designs and to studies with no design recorded, a group that includes much of the laboratory and imaging work.

Interpretation: a large sample is not the same as strong evidence. The library's largest counts come from pooled and registry studies, which can only show association. Its most decisive single results, the randomised trials, are mid-sized by this table.

Participant counts by study design, from the study library
Design groupStudies with a countMedianLower quartileUpper quartile
Meta-analysis or systematic review6311,68719311,134
Cohort or longitudinal study1,952619.5154.23,371.2
Cross-sectional study82029497.251,095
Case-control study168258.5921,348.8
No design recorded4,92616747819.5
Randomised or phase 2/3 trial86114753.5462.5

Size by subject

Subjects with at least 20 studies carrying a count, ordered by median. The second column shows how many of the subject's studies record a count at all.

Participant counts by library subject, from the study library
SubjectWith a count / in subjectMedianLower quartileUpper quartile
Prevention and risk366 / 1,0042,006362.526,698.2
Costs and economics75 / 1991,62041725,109
Long-term cohort studies366 / 5421,559276.58,312.2
How common it is273 / 5221,2782147,907.5
Disparities384 / 8331,165262.25,706
Health systems and care delivery230 / 654956.599.2512,509.5
Risk factors733 / 2,1746451475,461.5
Drug development106 / 8735705912,701.2
Genetics514 / 1,6154971252,311.5
Vascular contributions190 / 546427.5121.21,349.2
Laboratory science20 / 46403167.2748.5
TREM2 and immune genetics65 / 701303421,003.5
Biomarkers871 / 1,79823384645
Getting a diagnosis388 / 815204661,049.8
Digital health tools400 / 1,094196.548.251,953.8
Prevention trials322 / 83519252.51,201
Caregiving311 / 83319154727
Treatments583 / 1,48918963726
Clinical safety270 / 630185.572.25821
Brain tissue and pathology152 / 612169491,099.2
End-of-life care315 / 855164431,350
Mild cognitive impairment297 / 70116348.5512.5
Cognitive tests and assessment481 / 88113053495
Clinical trials87 / 16211948309
Tau biomarkers345 / 69011144355
Lewy body dementia115 / 56610740394
Disease mechanisms100 / 1,380101.527.5418.2
Brain scans and imaging543 / 1,4599435300
Down syndrome and Alzheimer's137 / 6647226227
Risk genes beyond APOE69 / 8476730241
Inflammation and the immune system70 / 8686025.75418.5
Hippocampus size on brain scans182 / 49252.523187.2

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Size by evidence rating

Our summaries rate each study's evidence. The rating is made from design and reporting, not from size, so this table asks whether size tracks it anyway.

Participant counts by evidence rating, from the study library
Rated in our summaryStudies with a countMedianLower quartileUpper quartile
high1,482272671,640.5
moderate3,3324861252,220
low4,48615645769
null-result235982041,021
early3027075.751,959.2
preliminary768197,496

The ten largest counts in the library

As recorded in the file. Several are pooled analyses or national registries, where the count is the number of records analysed rather than people recruited.

  1. Association between vaccinations and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis 104,031,186 participants · Age and Ageing, 2025 · meta-analysis ·
  2. Long-term air pollution exposure and incident dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis 24,030,527 participants · Lancet Planetary Health, 2025 · meta-analysis ·
  3. Risk of Dementia in Individuals With Emergency Department Visits or Hospitalizations Due to Cannabis 6,086,794 participants · JAMA Neurology, 2025 · cohort ·
  4. Time to nursing home admission and death in people with dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis 5,553,960 participants · BMJ, 2025 · meta-analysis ·
  5. Domain-specific physical activity levels and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis 4,227,297 participants · The Lancet. Public health, 2026 · meta-analysis ·
  6. Changes in Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Dementia in a Nationwide Cohort in South Korea 3,933,382 participants · JAMA Network Open, 2023 · cohort ·
  7. Association of Metformin use with risk of dementia in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis 3,463,100 participants · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2025 · meta-analysis ·
  8. Anti-diabetic agents and the risks of dementia in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials 3,462,926 participants · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 2024 · meta-analysis ·
  9. Association of Medicare bundled payment model with joint replacement care for people with dementia 3,361,950 participants · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022 · cohort study ·
  10. Medicare's Annual Wellness Visit and diagnoses of dementias and cognitive impairment 3,333,617 participants · Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring, 2022 · retrospective cohort ·

Read these caveats first

  1. Coverage. Only 34.2% of records carry a count. The missing ones are not random: laboratory studies, reviews without pooling and older records are less likely to state one, so the medians above describe the studies that reported a number.
  2. What a count means. For a meta-analysis the figure is the pooled total across included studies; for a registry or claims study it can be an entire population. The same number means different things in different designs.
  3. Extraction. The count was read from each paper's abstract by the summary pipeline. Where an abstract gives several numbers, the one recorded may be the screened, randomised or analysed figure.
  4. This library, not the field. The library is a large curated sample weighted towards recent and highly cited work, not a census of Alzheimer's research. See what the library's numbers show.

Browse the library with filters →

Related: how much of the library is free to read · APOE4 by the numbers · how to read a study