Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

The category of neocortical LP according to the LPC system was associated with a 5.9 OR (p < 0.0001) of dementia in the 134 NBTR cases and a 3.14 OR (p = 0.0001) in the 202 UPBB cases. We expect that it will be reliable and useful in routine diagnostic practice and, therefore, suggest that it should be the standard future approach for the basic post-mortem evaluation of LP.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Attems, J., Toledo, J. B., Walker, L., Gelpi, E., Gentleman, S., Halliday, G., et al. (2021). Neuropathological consensus criteria for the evaluation of Lewy pathology in post-mortem brains: a multi-centre study. Acta neuropathologica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02255-2

Vancouver

Attems J, Toledo JB, Walker L, Gelpi E, Gentleman S, Halliday G, et al. Neuropathological consensus criteria for the evaluation of Lewy pathology in post-mortem brains: a multi-centre study. Acta neuropathologica. 2021. doi:10.1007/s00401-020-02255-2. PMID: 33399945.

BibTeX

@article{attems2021-33399945,
  author  = {Attems, J. and Toledo, J. B. and Walker, L. and Gelpi, E. and Gentleman, S. and Halliday, G. and Hortobagyi, T. and Jellinger, K. and others},
  title   = {{Neuropathological consensus criteria for the evaluation of Lewy pathology in post-mortem brains: a multi-centre study}},
  journal = {Acta neuropathologica},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1007/s00401-020-02255-2},
  pmid    = {33399945},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02255-2}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This multi-centre study found that the neocortical Lewy pathology category was associated with higher odds of dementia in two case sets. The authors suggest this system should be the standard future approach for basic post-mortem evaluation of Lewy pathology, so it concerns diagnosis after death rather than treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 65/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 65 of 100.65 of 100 points earned35 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Acta neuropathologica)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Acta Neuropathologica: journal h-index 287 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 202 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 283 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 40.4 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 17.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 24 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 192 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Ian Grant McKeith: h-index 119 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Oxford: institution h-index 2,205 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 27 institution(s) in 12 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33399945)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 65 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

24 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “lewy”

1,017 studies in the library carry the topic tag “lewy”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,017 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →