Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) α-synuclein (α-syn) seed amplification assays (SAAs) can detect Lewy body pathology (LBP) with high accuracy but are invasive and costly. To address these challenges, this study evaluated a two-step workflow combining prescreening via smell-function testing with confirmatory CSF α-syn SAA testing only in individuals with reduced smell, for predicting postmortem LBP status. Among 358 autopsied participants, the two-step workflow predicted brain LBP with high accuracy overall (94%), and within clinical subgroups (clinical parkinsonism=95%; clinical Alzheimer's disease [AD]=94%; clinically unimpaired [CU]=93%). It reduced the need for confirmatory CSF testing by 43% overall (23% clinical parkinsonism; 35% clinical AD; 80% CU). In an independent in vivo cohort (N=1209), the workflow predicted CSF α-syn SAA status with 79% accuracy and reduced CSF testing by 26%. This approach may reduce invasive CSF testing, alleviating patient burden and lowering healthcare costs.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study evaluated a two-step approach combining smell-function testing with confirmatory CSF α-synuclein seed amplification to detect Lewy body pathology. Among 358 autopsied participants, the workflow predicted brain Lewy body pathology with 94% accuracy and reduced the need for confirmatory CSF testing by 43%, which the authors say may reduce invasive testing and lower healthcare costs.

Study details

Limitations

Autopsy cohort from a single brain bank; smell loss has many other causes, especially after COVID-19; accuracy in the living cohort was lower; not yet validated prospectively in clinical practice.

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 2 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 62 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 63 of 100. Total 63 of 100.62 of the 98 points we could judge = 63 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 62 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 63 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Nature Communications)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Nature Communications: journal h-index 747 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 2 / 5 Rated “early” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,567 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 6 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Oskar Hansson: h-index 148 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University College London: institution h-index 2,029 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 11 institution(s) in 5 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40764485)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 62 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 62 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 63 out of 100.
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Mastenbroek, S. E., Collij, L. E., Vogel, J. W., Caldera, S., Serrano, G. E., Adler, C. H., et al. (2025). Two-step detection of Lewy body pathology via smell-function testing and CSF α-synuclein seed amplification. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62458-7

Vancouver

Mastenbroek SE, Collij LE, Vogel JW, Caldera S, Serrano GE, Adler CH, et al. Two-step detection of Lewy body pathology via smell-function testing and CSF α-synuclein seed amplification. Nature Communications. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62458-7. PMID: 40764485.

BibTeX

@article{mastenbroek2025-40764485,
  author  = {Mastenbroek, S. E. and Collij, L. E. and Vogel, J. W. and Caldera, S. and Serrano, G. E. and Adler, C. H. and Vargiu, C. M. and Palmqvist, S. and Barkhof, F. and Parchi, P. and others},
  title   = {{Two-step detection of Lewy body pathology via smell-function testing and CSF α-synuclein seed amplification}},
  journal = {Nature Communications},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41467-025-62458-7},
  pmid    = {40764485},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62458-7}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 13.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “bodies”

1,017 studies in the library carry the topic tag “bodies”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,017 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →