Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 37 out of 100. Lewy body dementia

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Gait disturbances (odds ratio (OR) = 19.32; p = 0.01), visual-spatial complaints (OR = 6.06; p = 0.03), and visual hallucinations (OR = 31.06; p = 0.002) predicted DLB compared to AD, along with better memory (OR = 3.42; p = 0.003), naming (OR = 3.35; p = 0.002), and worse processing speed (OR = 0.51; p = 0.01). When comparing DLB to DLB/AD, gait disturbances (OR = 6.33; p = 0.01), increased depressive symptoms (OR = 1.44; p = 0.03), and better memory (OR = 3.01; p = 0.004) predicted DLB. Finally, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) (OR = 6.44; p = 0.004), parkinsonism severity (OR = 1.07; p = 0.02), and lower depressive symptoms (OR = 0.70; p = 0.006) and memory impairment (OR = 0.57; p = 0.02) distinguished DLB/AD from AD. Our study converges with prior research suggesting specific neuropsychological and clinical features can help distinguish DLB from AD. Neuropsychological differentiation becomes more challenging among mixed pathologies and in advanced cognitive impairment, although the presence of RBD and parkinsonism distinguished DLB. Earlier clinical assessment and incorporation of in vivo and postmortem biomarkers should enhance diagnostic accuracy and understanding of disease characteristics, offering significant relevance for disease-modifying treatments.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that features such as gait disturbances, visual-spatial complaints, visual hallucinations, better memory and naming, and worse processing speed helped distinguish dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer's disease, though differentiation became harder with mixed pathologies and advanced cognitive impairment. The authors note relevance for disease-modifying treatments but do not test any treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 37/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 37 of 100.37 of 100 points earned63 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports: journal h-index 40 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Michael S. Daniel: h-index 9 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 University of Nevada, Reno: institution h-index 514 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40034524)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 37 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Simpson, A., Wyman‐Chick, K. A., & Daniel, M. S. (2025). Neuropsychological and clinical indicators of Lewy body and Alzheimer's pathology. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/25424823241304386

Vancouver

Simpson A, Wyman‐Chick KA, Daniel MS. Neuropsychological and clinical indicators of Lewy body and Alzheimer's pathology. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports. 2025. doi:10.1177/25424823241304386. PMID: 40034524.

BibTeX

@article{simpson2025-40034524,
  author  = {Simpson, Abigail and Wyman‐Chick, Kathryn A and Daniel, Michael S.},
  title   = {{Neuropsychological and clinical indicators of Lewy body and Alzheimer's pathology}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1177/25424823241304386},
  pmid    = {40034524},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/25424823241304386}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 23.

Related studies in Lewy body dementia

Also tagged “bodies”

1,017 studies in the library carry the topic tag “bodies”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,017 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Lewy body dementia

See all studies in Lewy body dementia →