Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 57 out of 100. Tau biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Plain-language summary

Importance Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may be an early indicator of Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD), yet its association with plasma biomarkers remains unclear among middle-aged and older adults (aged 50-86 years). Objective To examine associations between plasma biomarkers of amyloid, tau, neuroaxonal damage, and glial activation with SCD in a heterogeneous cohort of Hispanic and/or Latino adults. Design, setting, and participants This cross-sectional study used survey-weighted data from the Study of Latinos-Investigation of Neurocognitive Aging, an ancillary study of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Moderate

This is a cross-sectional study of 5,712 participants. This cross-sectional study examined associations between several plasma biomarkers and subjective cognitive decline in middle-aged and older Hispanic and/or Latino adults. Reported effect size: 53.92%.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Márquez, F., Tarraf, W., Gonzalez, K., Valencia, D. F., Stickel, A. M., Anita, N. Z., et al. (2025). Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers and Subjective Cognitive Decline Among Hispanic and/or Latino Adults. JAMA network open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31038

Vancouver

Márquez F, Tarraf W, Gonzalez K, Valencia DF, Stickel AM, Anita NZ, et al. Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers and Subjective Cognitive Decline Among Hispanic and/or Latino Adults. JAMA network open. 2025. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31038. PMID: 40911305.

BibTeX

@article{marquez2025-40911305,
  author  = {Márquez, F. and Tarraf, W. and Gonzalez, K. and Valencia, D. F. and Stickel, A. M. and Anita, N. Z. and Sotres-Alvarez, D. and Levin, B. E. and others},
  title   = {{Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers and Subjective Cognitive Decline Among Hispanic and/or Latino Adults}},
  journal = {JAMA network open},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31038},
  pmid    = {40911305},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31038}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This cross-sectional study examined associations between several plasma biomarkers and subjective cognitive decline in middle-aged and older Hispanic and/or Latino adults. It is about biomarker associations with a self-reported symptom, not about treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 57/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 57 of 100.57 of 100 points earned43 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA network open)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 JAMA Network Open: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 5,712 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 8 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 8 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Héctor M. González: h-index 28 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of California San Diego: institution h-index 1,852 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40911305)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 57 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Tau biomarkers from nearby years

Also tagged “cerebrospinal”

820 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebrospinal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 820 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Tau biomarkers

See all studies in Tau biomarkers →