Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Among 5712 adults (mean [SD] age, 63.47 (8.15) years; unweighted 3663 [53.92%] female), higher ln(ptau-181) was associated with ECog-12 memory (unstandardized β = 0.088; 95% CI, 0.005-0.170). Higher ln(NfL) levels were associated with greater ECog-12 global (unstandardized β = 0.169; 95% CI, 0.074-0.265), executive (unstandardized β = 0.182; 95% CI, 0.087-0.277), and memory (unstandardized β = 0.156; 95% CI, 0.065-0.248) domains. Higher ln(GFAP) levels were associated with greater ECog-12 global (unstandardized β = 0.109; 95% CI, 0.019-0.198) and executive (unstandardized β = 0.121; 95% CI, 0.031-0.211) domains. Ln(Aβ42/40) was not associated with SCD domains. Cognitive concerns significantly modified the associations between ln(NfL) and ECog-12 domains, with more pronounced associations among those reporting cognitive concerns. No biomarkers were associated with the single-item cognitive concerns score. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of middle-aged and older Hispanic and/or Latino adults, plasma biomarkers of p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP, but not Aβ42/40, were associated with greater SCD. These findings underscore their potential utility in early ADRD detection strategies.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Gallo, L. C., Stickel, A. M., Zhou, H., González, H. M., Yassa, M. A., Valencia, D. F., et al. (2026). Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers and Subjective Cognitive Decline Among Hispanic and/or Latino Adults. UNC Libraries. https://doi.org/10.17615/x9sz-g140

Vancouver

Gallo LC, Stickel AM, Zhou H, González HM, Yassa MA, Valencia DF, et al. Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers and Subjective Cognitive Decline Among Hispanic and/or Latino Adults. UNC Libraries. 2026. doi:10.17615/x9sz-g140.

BibTeX

@article{gallo2026-034324bf,
  author  = {Gallo, Linda C. and Stickel, Ariana M. and Zhou, Haibo and González, Hector M. and Yassa, Michael A. and Valencia, Deisha F. and Gonzalez, Kevin and Goodman, Zachary T. and others},
  title   = {{Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers and Subjective Cognitive Decline Among Hispanic and/or Latino Adults}},
  journal = {UNC Libraries},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.17615/x9sz-g140},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.17615/x9sz-g140}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Plasma biomarkers p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP, but not Aβ42/40, were associated with greater subjective cognitive decline in Hispanic and/or Latino adults. These findings underscore their potential utility in early detection strategies.

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 43 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 45 of 100. Total 45 of 100.43 of the 96 points we could judge = 45 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, so that was left out: it earned 43 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (UNC Libraries)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 5,712 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Natasha Z. Anita: h-index 8 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: institution h-index 1,674 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 43 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 43 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100.
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “cerebrospinal”

820 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebrospinal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 820 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →