Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 57 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

This study examined the combined effects of StrongerMemory program (brain exercises involving reading, writing, and math) and weekly social engagement on cognitive, behavioral, and emotional outcomes in older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). A 12-week randomized controlled trial was conducted with 50 participants, who were randomly assigned to either a control group (StrongerMemory only) or an intervention group (StrongerMemory plus weekly social engagement). Cognitive function (MoCA), perceived cognitive decline (SCD-Q), health behaviors (GHPS), and emotional well-being (SWEMWBS) were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Both groups showed significant cognitive improvements (increased MoCA, decreased SCD-Q) post-intervention. ANCOVA revealed significantly better cognitive function in the intervention group, demonstrating the synergistic benefits of social engagement. The intervention group also experienced enhanced emotional well-being. These findings suggest that incorporating social engagement into cognitive training programs enhances their effectiveness in improving cognitive function and emotional well-being in older adults with SCD, potentially mitigating further decline. While the findings are promising, this exploratory study's small sample size resulted in modest achieved power (0.64), which may limit the generalizability of the results.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this 12-week trial of 50 older adults with subjective cognitive decline, adding weekly social engagement to a brain-exercise program led to better cognitive function and emotional well-being than brain exercises alone. The authors note the small sample size limited the study's power, so the results are exploratory and need confirmation.

Study details

How this study scored 57/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 55 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 57 of 100. Total 57 of 100.55 of the 96 points we could judge = 57 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 55 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 57 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Sage Open Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Sage Open Aging: journal h-index 6 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 50 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 6 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Mckenzie Lauber holds only 4 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 George Mason University: institution h-index 566 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40894462)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 55 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 55 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 57 out of 100.
Total 57 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Kang, H., Ihara, E. S., Tompkins, C. J., & Lauber, M. (2025). Boosting Cognitive Training through Social Engagement: Impacts on Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline. Sage Open Aging. https://doi.org/10.1177/30495334251366575

Vancouver

Kang H, Ihara ES, Tompkins CJ, Lauber M. Boosting Cognitive Training through Social Engagement: Impacts on Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline. Sage Open Aging. 2025. doi:10.1177/30495334251366575. PMID: 40894462.

BibTeX

@article{kang2025-40894462,
  author  = {Kang, Hyun and Ihara, Emily S. and Tompkins, Catherine J. and Lauber, Mckenzie},
  title   = {{Boosting Cognitive Training through Social Engagement: Impacts on Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline}},
  journal = {Sage Open Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1177/30495334251366575},
  pmid    = {40894462},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/30495334251366575}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Prevention trials

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →