Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 27 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Cognitive impairment in the elderly causes a decrease in the ability to do various things related to thinking and remembering. Dementia is a term used to describe memory decline in the elderly. Prevention of cognitive impairment can be done by using media that stimulate brain activity. Scrabble is a type of board game that emphasizes initiative, creativity, planning, and flexibility in dealing with success or failure while being entertaining.This study aims to determine the effect of board games (scrabble) on increasing cognitive capacity in the elderly with dementia. The study was conducted at Tresna Werdha Budi Mulia 2 Jelambar, West Jakarta during January-July 2023. The target of the study was the elderly living in nursing homes. Using the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) analytical method, this study design used a quasi-experiment with a two-stage approach. Group pretest-posttest design approach. The sample consisted of 31 elderly in the control group and 31 elderly in the intervention group. The sampling strategy was random using the two-population proportion formula. The research instrument used was the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) questionnaire. Nine therapy sessions were given, and the eighth session showed a significant improvement after the implementation of scrabble game therapy. Statistical test using Paired T-test p-value of 0.000 < (α) 0.05 showed that board games (scrabble) can improve cognitive capacity in elderly with dementia. Broad-games therapy: Scrabble can be routinely recommended to be included in daily activities for the elderly so that it can delay the severity of dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Jannah, E. S. M., Anwar, S., & Herlina, L. (2025). THE EFFECT OF BOARDGAMES THERAPY: SCRABBLE ON COGNITIVE ABILITIES IN ELDERLY WITH DEMENTIA. Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Poltekkes Depkes Bandung. https://doi.org/10.34011/juriskesbdg.v17i1.2638

Vancouver

Jannah ESM, Anwar S, Herlina L. THE EFFECT OF BOARDGAMES THERAPY: SCRABBLE ON COGNITIVE ABILITIES IN ELDERLY WITH DEMENTIA. Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Poltekkes Depkes Bandung. 2025. doi:10.34011/juriskesbdg.v17i1.2638.

BibTeX

@article{jannah2025-d9426506,
  author  = {Jannah, Eka Sindi Miftahul and Anwar, Syamsul and Herlina, Lily},
  title   = {{THE EFFECT OF BOARDGAMES THERAPY: SCRABBLE ON COGNITIVE ABILITIES IN ELDERLY WITH DEMENTIA}},
  journal = {Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Poltekkes Depkes Bandung},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.34011/juriskesbdg.v17i1.2638},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.34011/juriskesbdg.v17i1.2638}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this study of 62 elderly people with dementia, nine sessions of Scrabble game therapy significantly improved cognitive capacity as measured by the MMSE. The eighth session showed a significant improvement.

Study details

How this study scored 27/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 27 of 100.27 of 100 points earned73 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Poltekkes Depkes Bandung)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Poltekkes Depkes Bandung: journal h-index 9 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Lily Herlina: h-index 2 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta: institution h-index 48 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 27 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Also tagged “controlled”

1,116 studies in the library carry the topic tag “controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,116 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →