Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The results of the included studies were summarized using a narrative synthesis or meta-analysis, as appropriate. Results Of the 559 citations retrieved, 11 (2%) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ultimately met all eligibility criteria for this review. A meta-analysis of 45% (5/11) of the RCTs revealed that serious games are effective in improving verbal learning among older adults with cognitive impairment in comparison with no or sham interventions (P=.04), and serious games do not have a different effect on verbal learning between patients with mild cognitive impairment and those with Alzheimer disease (P=.89). A meta-analysis of 18% (2/11) of the RCTs revealed that serious games are as effective as conventional exercises in promoting verbal learning (P=.98). However, our findings remain inconclusive because of the low quality of evidence, the small sample size in most of the meta-analyzed studies (6/8, 75%), and the paucity of studies included in the meta-analyses.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review of 11 randomized trials found serious games improved verbal learning compared with no or sham interventions, and worked as well as conventional exercises. However, the authors call the findings inconclusive because of low-quality evidence, small samples, and few studies.

Study details

How this study scored 60/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 60 of 100.60 of 100 points earned40 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of medical Internet research)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of Medical Internet Research: journal h-index 286 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 28 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 5.6 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 26 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Javaid I. Sheikh: h-index 51 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Weill Cornell Medicine: institution h-index 1,163 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37043277)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 60 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Abd-Alrazaq, A., Abuelezz, I., AlSaad, R., Al-Jafar, E., Ahmed, A., Aziz, S., et al. (2023). Serious Games for Learning Among Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of medical Internet research. https://doi.org/10.2196/43607

Vancouver

Abd-Alrazaq A, Abuelezz I, AlSaad R, Al-Jafar E, Ahmed A, Aziz S, et al. Serious Games for Learning Among Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of medical Internet research. 2023. doi:10.2196/43607. PMID: 37043277.

BibTeX

@article{abdalrazaq2023-37043277,
  author  = {Abd-Alrazaq, A. and Abuelezz, I. and AlSaad, R. and Al-Jafar, E. and Ahmed, A. and Aziz, S. and Nashwan, A. and Sheikh, J.},
  title   = {{Serious Games for Learning Among Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis}},
  journal = {Journal of medical Internet research},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.2196/43607},
  pmid    = {37043277},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2196/43607}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Treatments

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →