Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Unlabelled A common quantitative output value for PET measures of β-amyloid (Aβ) binding across tracers and methods would allow better comparison of data across sites and application of universal diagnostic and prognostic values. A method has recently been developed that generates a unit of measurement called the centiloid. We applied this method to 2-[2-(18)F-fluoro-6-(methylamino)-3-pyridinyl]-1-benzofuran-5-ol ((18)F-NAV4694) and (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B ((11)C-PiB) Aβ images to derive the scaling factor required to express tracer binding in centiloids. Methods Fifty-five participants, including 10 young controls (33 ± 7 y old), underwent both (11)C-PiB and (18)F-NAV4694 imaging no more than 3 mo apart, with the images acquired 50-70 min after tracer injection. The images were spatially normalized and analyzed using the standard centiloid method and regions (cortex and whole-cerebellum reference) downloaded from the Global Alzheimer Association Interactive Network website. Results SUV ratios (SUVRs) showed a strong correlation in tracer binding ((18)F-NAV4694 SUVR = 1.09 × (11)C-PiB SUVR - 0.08, R(2) = 0.99). The equation to convert (18)F-NAV4694 to centiloids [100 × ((18)F-NAV4694 SUVR - 1.028)/1.174] was similar to a published equation for (11)C-PiB [100 × ((11)C-PiB SUVR - 1.009)/1.067]. In the young controls, the variance ratio ((18)F-NAV4694 centiloid SD divided by (11)C-PiB centiloid SD) was 0.85. Conclusion The results for both (11)C-PiB and (18)F-NAV4694 can now be expressed in centiloids, an important step that should allow better clinical and research use of Aβ imaging. The standard centiloid method also showed that (18)F-NAV4694 has slightly higher Aβ binding and lower variance than (11)C-PiB, important properties for detecting early Aβ deposition and change over time.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Rowe, C. C., Jones, G., Doré, V., Pejoska, S., Margison, L., Mulligan, R. S., et al. (2016). Standardized Expression of 18F-NAV4694 and 11C-PiB β-Amyloid PET Results with the Centiloid Scale. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.171595

Vancouver

Rowe CC, Jones G, Doré V, Pejoska S, Margison L, Mulligan RS, et al. Standardized Expression of 18F-NAV4694 and 11C-PiB β-Amyloid PET Results with the Centiloid Scale. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2016. doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.171595. PMID: 26912446.

BibTeX

@article{rowe2016-26912446,
  author  = {Rowe, C. C. and Jones, G. and Doré, V. and Pejoska, S. and Margison, L. and Mulligan, R. S. and Chan, J. G. and Young, K. and others},
  title   = {{Standardized Expression of 18F-NAV4694 and 11C-PiB β-Amyloid PET Results with the Centiloid Scale}},
  journal = {Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine},
  year    = {2016},
  doi     = {10.2967/jnumed.115.171595},
  pmid    = {26912446},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.171595}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study worked out how to express results from two amyloid PET tracers on the same centiloid scale, and found the two tracers correlated strongly. This is a measurement advance for comparing scans across sites, not a treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 47 of 100.47 of 100 points earned53 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Nuclear Medicine: journal h-index 230 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2016 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 141 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 11.8 citations a year over 12 year(s) since 2016
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 6.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 14 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 64 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Victor L. Villemagne: h-index 110 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 The University of Melbourne: institution h-index 1,342 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 26912446)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — Unpaywall lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

14 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “machine”

834 studies in the library carry the topic tag “machine”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 834 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →