Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

BackgroundThe Centiloid (CL) scale standardizes global amyloid PET quantification and is widely used to define amyloid positivity. As a global summary measure, however, CL may not fully reflect the regional distribution of amyloid deposition, which can carry additional prognostic information about the rate of cognitive decline. ObjectiveTo develop and externally validate a fixed, regional amyloid PET composite score that complements CL for predicting cognitive decline in Alzheimers disease. MethodsThe Regional Amyloid PET Score (RAPS) was derived from 82 FreeSurfer regions using machine learning with bootstrap stability selection to predict the rate of change in CDR-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) in 433 amyloid-positive ADNI [18F]florbetapir participants. The fixed nine-region weights were applied without retraining in a cross-tracer ADNI [18F]florbetaben subset (N = 71; largely overlapping the discovery participants) and two external validation cohorts, NACC SCAN (N = 1531; four tracers) and OASIS-3 (N = 428). ResultsRAPS comprised nine regions. In ADNI, RAPS correlated more strongly with CDR-SB slope than CL and showed higher discrimination of rapid decliners (AUC 0.813 vs 0.713). Performance was directionally consistent across validation cohorts; in NACC SCAN, RAPS and CL independently predicted clinical progression. Cross-cohort meta-analysis of the three independent cohorts supported incremental discrimination beyond CL (pooled {Delta}AUC +0.066; I2 = 0%). ConclusionsRAPS, a fixed regional amyloid PET-derived score, may complement CL for prognostic stratification in Alzheimers disease research.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study developed a nine-region amyloid PET score that predicted cognitive decline more strongly than the Centiloid scale in ADNI and performed consistently in external validation cohorts. It is a prognostic imaging tool, not a treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 38 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 40 of 100. Raw total 40 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 40 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 40 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 38 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv (preprint))
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 71 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: h-index 3 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Juntendo University: institution h-index 530 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 38 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 38 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100.
Total 40 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Hirose, T., Akamatsu, W., & Kato, T. (2026). A data-driven regional amyloid PET score predicts cognitive decline beyond Centiloid. medRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.26.26360248

Vancouver

Hirose T, Akamatsu W, Kato T. A data-driven regional amyloid PET score predicts cognitive decline beyond Centiloid. medRxiv (preprint). 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.08.26.26360248.

BibTeX

@article{hirose2026-b90b0bb3,
  author  = {Hirose, T. and Akamatsu, W. and Kato, T.},
  title   = {{A data-driven regional amyloid PET score predicts cognitive decline beyond Centiloid}},
  journal = {medRxiv (preprint)},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.08.26.26360248},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.26.26360248}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 24.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →