Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 70 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Predicting not just if, but also when, cognitively unimpaired individuals are likely to develop onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD) symptoms would be useful to clinical trials and, eventually, clinical practice. Although clock models based on amyloid and tau positron emission tomography have shown promise in predicting the onset of AD symptoms, a model based on plasma biomarkers would be more accessible. Using longitudinal plasma %p-tau217 (the ratio of phosphorylated to non-phosphorylated tau at position 217) from two independent cohorts (n = 258 and n = 345), clock models were used to estimate the age at plasma %p-tau217 positivity. The estimated age at plasma %p-tau217 positivity was associated with the age at onset of AD symptoms (adjusted R 2 of 0.337-0.612) with a median absolute error of 3.0-3.7 years. Notably, the time from %p-tau217 positivity to onset of AD symptoms was markedly shorter in older individuals. Similar models were constructed with data from one p-tau217/Aβ42 immunoassay and four plasma p-tau217 immunoassays. These findings suggest that the time until onset of AD symptoms can be estimated using a single blood test within a margin of error that is acceptable for use in clinical trials.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Petersen, K. K., Milà-Alomà, M., Li, Y., Du, L., Xiong, C., Tosun, D., et al. (2026). Predicting onset of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease with plasma p-tau217 clocks. Nature medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04206-y

Vancouver

Petersen KK, Milà-Alomà M, Li Y, Du L, Xiong C, Tosun D, et al. Predicting onset of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease with plasma p-tau217 clocks. Nature medicine. 2026. doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04206-y. PMID: 41714746.

BibTeX

@article{petersen2026-41714746,
  author  = {Petersen, Kellen K and Milà-Alomà, Marta and Li, Yan and Du, Lianlian and Xiong, Chengjie and Tosun, Duygu and Saef, Benjamin and Saad, Ziad S and others},
  title   = {{Predicting onset of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease with plasma p-tau217 clocks}},
  journal = {Nature medicine},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41591-026-04206-y},
  pmid    = {41714746},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04206-y}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Using repeated blood tests for a tau marker, this study estimated the age at which a person would first test positive and linked it to the age when Alzheimer's symptoms began, with a median error of about 3 to 3.7 years. The authors suggest this single blood test approach could be useful for clinical trials, though it is not yet a clinical tool.

Study details

Limitations

Two research cohorts of volunteers, not community samples; the clocks are calibrated to symptom onset in those cohorts and need external validation; the error margin is too wide for individual prediction.

How this study scored 70/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 10 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 69 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 70 of 100. Total 70 of 100.69 of the 98 points we could judge = 70 of 100

Published in a top-tier journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 69 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 70 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 10 / 10 Tier 1 — top-tier general journal (Nature medicine)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Nature Medicine: journal h-index 763 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 603 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 37 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 18.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 169.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 4 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 37 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): h-index 4 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University College London: institution h-index 2,029 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 23 institution(s) in 4 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41714746)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 69 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 69 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 70 out of 100.
Total 70 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 25.

In the news

1 news article on alzhub's news page cites this paper.

Later studies that cite this one

4 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “phosphorylated”

732 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylated”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 732 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →