Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background and objectives To predict when cognitively normal individuals with brain amyloidosis will develop symptoms of Alzheimer disease (AD). Methods Brain amyloid burden was measured by amyloid PET with Pittsburgh compound B. The mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was transformed into a timescale with the use of longitudinal data. Results Amyloid accumulation was evaluated in 236 individuals who underwent >1 amyloid PET scan. The average age was 66.5 ± 9.2 years, and 12 individuals (5%) had cognitive impairment at their baseline amyloid PET scan. A tipping point in amyloid accumulation was identified at a low level of amyloid burden (SUVR 1.2), after which nearly all individuals accumulated amyloid at a relatively consistent rate until reaching a high level of amyloid burden (SUVR 3.0). The average time between levels of amyloid burden was used to estimate the age at which an individual reached SUVR 1.2. Longitudinal clinical diagnoses for 180 individuals were aligned by the estimated age at SUVR 1.2. In the 22 individuals who progressed from cognitively normal to a typical AD dementia syndrome, the estimated age at which an individual reached SUVR 1.2 predicted the age at symptom onset ( R 2 = 0.54, p R 2 = 0.84, p Conclusion The age at symptom onset in sporadic AD is strongly correlated with the age at which an individual reaches a tipping point in amyloid accumulation.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Schindler, S. E., Li, Y., Buckles, V. D., Gordon, B. A., Benzinger, T. L. S., Wang, G., et al. (2021). Predicting Symptom Onset in Sporadic Alzheimer Disease With Amyloid PET. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000012775

Vancouver

Schindler SE, Li Y, Buckles VD, Gordon BA, Benzinger TLS, Wang G, et al. Predicting Symptom Onset in Sporadic Alzheimer Disease With Amyloid PET. Neurology. 2021. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000012775. PMID: 34504028.

BibTeX

@article{schindler2021-34504028,
  author  = {Schindler, S. E. and Li, Y. and Buckles, V. D. and Gordon, B. A. and Benzinger, T. L. S. and Wang, G. and Coble, D. and Klunk, W. E. and others},
  title   = {{Predicting Symptom Onset in Sporadic Alzheimer Disease With Amyloid PET}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000012775},
  pmid    = {34504028},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000012775}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In cognitively normal people with brain amyloidosis, the estimated age at which amyloid reached a low tipping point predicted the age at symptom onset of Alzheimer dementia. This is a prediction model and does not show that any treatment, cure, or prevention works.

Study details

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 59 of the 93 points it could be judged on, which is 63 of 100. Total 63 of 100.59 of the 93 points we could judge = 63 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 59 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 63 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 236 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 91 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 13.0 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 8.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 8 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 62 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34504028)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 59 / 93 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 59 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 63 out of 100.
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 21.

Later studies that cite this one

8 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “machine”

834 studies in the library carry the topic tag “machine”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 834 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →