Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 72 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Importance Advances in Alzheimer disease (AD) have shifted research focus to earlier disease stages, necessitating more scalable approaches to identify cognitively unimpaired individuals with amyloid β (Aβ) pathology. Objective To assess the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) for classifying Aβ status in cognitively unimpaired individuals, both as a stand-alone test and in a 2-step approach where positive plasma results were confirmed using a second modality (Aβ positron emission tomography [PET] or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). Design, setting, and participants This cross-sectional cohort study used data collected between June 2009 and March 2024. We included 2916 cognitively unimpaired participants from 12 international independent observational cohorts in the US, Europe, Australia, and Canada with available plasma p-tau217 levels and CSF or PET Aβ biomarkers. Performance comparisons between mass spectrometry and immunoassay-based p-tau217 measurements were also performed (n = 964). Exposures Plasma p-tau217 levels measured by immunoassay. Main outcome and measures Aβ status, determined by CSF or Aβ PET biomarkers. Results Participants had a mean (SD) age of 66.9 (9.9) years; 971 (33.3%) were Aβ positive by either CSF or PET, 1667 (57.2%) were women, and 1108 (38.1%) carried at least 1 APOE ε4 allele. As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124. Immunoassays demonstrated comparable PPVs to mass spectrometry (80% [95% CI, 74-86] vs 85% [95% CI, 81-90]; P = .12) but significantly lower overall accuracy (82% [95% CI, 79-84]% vs 88 [95% CI, 86-90]; P Conclusions and relevance The findings highlight the potential of plasma p-tau217 as a stand-alone test-or when used in a sequential 2-step approach alongside PET or CSF testing-as a cost-effective, scalable, and minimally burdensome strategy for identifying preclinical AD. Tailored screening workflows that incorporate p-tau217 can improve efficiency in participant selection for preclinical AD trials and, in the future, help guide access to disease-modifying treatments.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Salvadó, G., Janelidze, S., Bali, D., Dolado, A. O., Therriault, J., Brum, W. S., et al. (2025). Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 to Identify Preclinical Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217

Vancouver

Salvadó G, Janelidze S, Bali D, Dolado AO, Therriault J, Brum WS, et al. Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 to Identify Preclinical Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurology. 2025. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217. PMID: 40952756.

BibTeX

@article{salvado2025-40952756,
  author  = {Salvadó, G. and Janelidze, S. and Bali, D. and Dolado, A. O. and Therriault, J. and Brum, W. S. and Pichet Binette, A. and Stomrud, E. and Mattsson-Carlgren, N. and Palmqvist, S. and Coomans, E. M. and Teunissen, C. E. and others},
  title   = {{Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 to Identify Preclinical Alzheimer Disease}},
  journal = {JAMA Neurology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217},
  pmid    = {40952756},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 2,916 cognitively unimpaired participants, plasma p-tau217 classified amyloid status both as a stand-alone test and in a two-step approach where positive results were confirmed with PET or cerebrospinal fluid. This supports using blood tests to identify preclinical Alzheimer's disease, though the study was cross-sectional.

Study details

Limitations

Use of multiple cohorts introduced variability in biomarker measurement despite harmonisation; reliable generalisable cut-offs for plasma p-tau217 are still needed; amyloid prevalence in the sample was slightly higher than in the general cognitively unimpaired population, so validation in more diverse samples is needed.

How this study scored 72/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 71 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 72 of 100. Total 72 of 100.71 of the 98 points we could judge = 72 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 71 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 72 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA Neurology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 JAMA Neurology: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 2,916 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 64 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 21.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 40.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 6 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 64 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Zaven S. Khachaturian: h-index 56 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Washington University in St. Louis: institution h-index 1,962 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 38 institution(s) in 9 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40952756)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 71 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 71 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 72 out of 100.
Total 72 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 21.

Later studies that cite this one

6 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “phosphorylated”

733 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylated”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 733 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →