Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 64 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Among cognitively normal participants with positive biomarkers, 34.4% developed cognitive impairment (Clinical Dementia Rating > 0) as compared to 8.4% of those with negative biomarkers. Cox proportional hazards modelling indicated that preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarker status, APOE ɛ4 carrier status, polygenic risk score and centred age influenced risk of developing cognitive impairment.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Long, J. M., Coble, D. W., Xiong, C., Schindler, S. E., Perrin, R. J., Gordon, B. A., et al. (2022). Preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarkers accurately predict cognitive and neuropathological outcomes. Brain : a journal of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac250

Vancouver

Long JM, Coble DW, Xiong C, Schindler SE, Perrin RJ, Gordon BA, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarkers accurately predict cognitive and neuropathological outcomes. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2022. doi:10.1093/brain/awac250. PMID: 35867858.

BibTeX

@article{long2022-35867858,
  author  = {Long, J. M. and Coble, D. W. and Xiong, C. and Schindler, S. E. and Perrin, R. J. and Gordon, B. A. and Benzinger, T. L. S. and Grant, E. and others},
  title   = {{Preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarkers accurately predict cognitive and neuropathological outcomes}},
  journal = {Brain : a journal of neurology},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.1093/brain/awac250},
  pmid    = {35867858},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac250}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Among cognitively normal people, those with positive preclinical Alzheimer's biomarkers were more likely to develop cognitive impairment than those with negative biomarkers, and biomarker status, APOE ɛ4 carrier status, polygenic risk score and age influenced that risk. This supports the idea that biomarkers can predict who will develop cognitive problems, but it does not show that any treatment, cure or prevention works.

Study details

How this study scored 64/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 61 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 64 of 100. Total 64 of 100.61 of the 96 points we could judge = 64 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 61 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 64 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Brain : a journal of neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Brain: journal h-index 503 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 720 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 48 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 8.0 citations a year over 6 year(s) since 2022
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 5 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 33 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Washington University in St. Louis: institution h-index 1,962 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 35867858)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 61 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 61 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 64 out of 100.
Total 64 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 47.

Later studies that cite this one

5 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “cerebrospinal”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebrospinal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →