Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 74 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background AD, the most prevalent cause of dementia, affects twice as many women as men. Therapeutic options are limited, but results of prior studies support the hypothesis that estrogen treatment may improve symptoms of women with this disorder. Methods Forty-two women with mild-to-moderate dementia due to AD were enrolled into a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial of unopposed conjugated equine estrogens (1.25 mg/day) for 16 weeks. Results Outcome data were available for 40 women at 4 weeks and 36 women at 16 weeks. At both 4 and 16 weeks, there were no significant differences or statistical trends between treatment groups on the primary outcome measure (the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale), clinician-rated global impression of change, or caregiver-rated functional status. Exploratory analyses of mood and specific aspects of cognitive performance also failed to demonstrate substantial group differences. Conclusion Although conclusions are limited by small sample size and the possibility of a type II error, results suggest that short-term estrogen therapy does not improve symptoms of most women with AD. These findings do not address possible long-term effects of estrogen in AD, possible interactions between estrogen and other treatment modalities, or putative effects of estrogen in preventing or delaying onset of this disorder.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Henderson, V. W., Paganini-Hill, A., Miller, B. L., Elble, R. J., Reyes, P. F., Shoupe, D., et al. (2000). Estrogen for Alzheimer's disease in women: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.2.295

Vancouver

Henderson VW, Paganini-Hill A, Miller BL, Elble RJ, Reyes PF, Shoupe D, et al. Estrogen for Alzheimer's disease in women: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2000. doi:10.1212/wnl.54.2.295. PMID: 10668686.

BibTeX

@article{henderson2000-10668686,
  author  = {Henderson, V. W. and Paganini-Hill, A. and Miller, B. L. and Elble, R. J. and Reyes, P. F. and Shoupe, D. and McCleary, C. A. and Klein, R. A. and others},
  title   = {{Estrogen for Alzheimer's disease in women: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2000},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.54.2.295},
  pmid    = {10668686},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.2.295}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 42 women with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia, short-term conjugated equine estrogens showed no significant differences or statistical trends versus placebo on the primary cognitive outcome, clinician-rated global impression of change, or caregiver-rated functional status. The authors conclude that short-term estrogen therapy does not improve symptoms of most women with Alzheimer's disease, while noting the small sample size limits conclusions.

Study details

How this study scored 74/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 74 of 100.74 of 100 points earned26 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomized controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size and effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomized controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2000 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomized / blinded 2 / 2 Randomized and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 551 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 19.7 citations a year over 28 year(s) since 2000
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 54.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 21 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 9 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Martin Rhys Farlow: h-index 118 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of California, Los Angeles: institution h-index 1,923 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 10668686)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 74 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

21 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Caregiving

Also tagged “placebo-controlled”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “placebo-controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →