Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 80 out of 100. How common it is

Reviewed as evidence on: Menopause timing / hormone therapy (estrogen-only) and dementia risk and AD neuropathology 7 studies (what the news said). Being listed means the study bears on the question, not that it agrees with the news.

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Context The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS) previously reported that estrogen plus progestin therapy does not protect cognition among women aged 65 years or older. The effect of estrogen-alone therapy, also evaluated in WHIMS, on cognition has not been established for this population. Objectives To determine whether conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) alters global cognitive function in older women and to compare its effect with CEE plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE plus MPA). Design, setting, and participants A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ancillary study of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), WHIMS evaluated the effect of CEE on incidence of probable dementia among community-dwelling women aged 65 to 79 years with prior hysterectomy from 39 US academic centers that started in June 1995. Of 3200 eligible women free of probable dementia enrolled in the WHI, 2947 (92.1%) were enrolled in WHIMS. Analyses were conducted on the 2808 women (95.3%) with a baseline and at least 1 follow-up measure of global cognitive function before the trial's termination on February 29, 2004. Interventions Participants received 1 daily tablet containing either 0.625 mg of CEE (n = 1387) or matching placebo (n = 1421). Main outcome measure Global cognitive function measured annually with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE). Results During a mean follow-up of 5.4 years, mean (SE) 3MSE scores were 0.26 (0.13) units lower than among women assigned to CEE compared with placebo (P =.04). For pooled hormone therapy (CEE combined with CEE plus MPA), the mean (SE) decrease was 0.21 (0.08; P =.006). Removing women with dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or stroke from the analyses lessened these differences. The adverse effect of hormone therapy was more pronounced among women with lower cognitive function at baseline (all P 2 SDs) was estimated to be 1.47 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.07). Conclusion For women aged 65 years or older, hormone therapy had an adverse effect on cognition, which was greater among women with lower cognitive function at initiation of treatment.

Key findings

Why it matters

In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 2,808 women aged 65–79 who had had a hysterectomy, those given daily conjugated equine estrogen scored 0.26 points lower on average on a global thinking test (3MSE) than those on placebo over about 5.4 years. The study concluded that, for women 65 or older, "hormone therapy had an adverse effect on cognition, which was greater among women with lower cognitive function at initiation of treatment." It measured test scores, not Alzheimer's diagnoses, and does not show how estrogen affects younger women.

Study details

How this study scored 80/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 10 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 80 of 100.80 of 100 points earned20 not earned

Published in a top-tier journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 10 / 10 Tier 1 — top-tier general journal (JAMA)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 JAMA: journal h-index 1,011 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2004 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 3 / 4 1,387 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 2 / 2 Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 796 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 33.2 citations a year over 24 year(s) since 2004
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 41.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 16 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 53 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Mark Andrew Espeland: h-index 90 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Wake Forest University: institution h-index 835 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 15213207)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 80 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Espeland, M. A., Rapp, SR., Shumaker, S. A., Brunner, R., Manson, J. E., Sherwin, B. B., et al. (2004). Conjugated equine estrogens and global cognitive function in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.24.2959

Vancouver

Espeland MA, Rapp SR, Shumaker SA, Brunner R, Manson JE, Sherwin BB, et al. Conjugated equine estrogens and global cognitive function in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study. JAMA. 2004. doi:10.1001/jama.291.24.2959. PMID: 15213207.

BibTeX

@article{espeland2004-15213207,
  author  = {Espeland, M. A. and Rapp, SR. and Shumaker, S. A. and Brunner, R. and Manson, J. E. and Sherwin, B. B. and Hsia, J. and Margolis, K. L. and others},
  title   = {{Conjugated equine estrogens and global cognitive function in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study}},
  journal = {JAMA},
  year    = {2004},
  doi     = {10.1001/jama.291.24.2959},
  pmid    = {15213207},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.24.2959}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

16 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in How common it is

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →