Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 37 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

-weighted magnetic resonance images of 41,708 cognitively normal adults in the UK Biobank. We identified 1,212 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with LBA in at least one brain region. Genes mapped to these SNPs are involved in developmental, metabolic, immune, and cytoskeletal pathways. Dimensionality reduction of SNP association profiles uncovered three clusters linked to morphogenetic, cytoskeletal, and immuno-epigenetic processes, helping to relate neuroanatomic, immunosenescent and epigenetic mechanisms of brain aging. Top variants are mapped to KCNK2, NUAK1, GMNC, MSL2, and to other genes implicated in neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration. Spatial clustering of LBA-associated variants in default mode, limbic, and motor network regions parallel regional vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. These findings establish a polygenic architecture for regional brain aging and support LBA as a genetically informed phenotype for studying aging-related neurodegeneration. Our results suggest that cortical aging is not governed by isolated loci but by coordinated genetic programs-rooted in development, metabolism, and cellular structure-that confer lifelong patterns of regional brain vulnerability and resilience. This first genetic dissection of spatially specific brain aging reveals a polygenic landscape of coordinated genetic programs, developmentally encoded and metabolically maintained during senescence. This study reframes aging as an anatomically specific genetic process reflecting the varying structural vulnerabilities observed across neurodegenerative diseases.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kim, N. J., Mishra, A., Chowdhury, N. F., Anderson, S. D., Vega, O. M., Chaudhari, N. N., et al. (2025). Deep neural networks and genome-wide associations reveal the polygenic architecture of local brain aging. GeroScience. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-02046-1

Vancouver

Kim NJ, Mishra A, Chowdhury NF, Anderson SD, Vega OM, Chaudhari NN, et al. Deep neural networks and genome-wide associations reveal the polygenic architecture of local brain aging. GeroScience. 2025. doi:10.1007/s11357-025-02046-1. PMID: 41381974.

BibTeX

@article{kim2025-41381974,
  author  = {Kim, Nicholas J. and Mishra, Ayati and Chowdhury, Nahian F. and Anderson, Samuel D. and Vega, Owen M. and Chaudhari, Nikhil N. and Buetow, Kenneth H. and Thompson, Paul M. and others},
  title   = {{Deep neural networks and genome-wide associations reveal the polygenic architecture of local brain aging}},
  journal = {GeroScience},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s11357-025-02046-1},
  pmid    = {41381974},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-02046-1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This genetic analysis of 41,708 cognitively normal adults identified 1,212 single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with local brain aging and mapped top variants to genes including KCNK2, NUAK1, GMNC, and MSL2. The findings establish a polygenic architecture for regional brain aging and suggest local brain aging as a phenotype for studying neurodegeneration, but they do not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 37/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 37 of 100.37 of 100 points earned63 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (GeroScience)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 GeroScience: journal h-index 83 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Andrei Irimia: h-index 38 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Southern California: institution h-index 1,521 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41381974)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 37 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Risk factors from nearby years

Also tagged “small”

900 studies in the library carry the topic tag “small”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 900 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →