Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 80 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment

In total, 30 studies were included comprising 14,997 subjects. Individuals with poor sleep quality exhibited greater PET Aβ burden and higher Aβ42 levels in plasma than those with good sleep quality. Shorter sleep duration was associated with higher Aβ burden on PET. However, no association between either sleep quality or sleep duration and tau levels was found. Sleep may be a modifiable marker of early AD management by modulating Aβ levels. HIGHLIGHTS: lPoor sleep quality and shorter sleep duration were significantly associated with higher amyloid beta (Aβ) burden detected by positron emission tomography (PET) in non-demented populations. Poor sleep quality was also associated with elevated Aβ42 levels in plasma. lNo significant associations were found between sleep quality or sleep duration and tau levels in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, or PET. lInterventions targeting sleep could serve as a viable and low-cost prevention strategy for early management of Alzheimer's disease.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Chen, C.-L., Zhang, M.-Y., Wang, Z.-L., Deng, J.-H., Bao, Y.-P., Shi, J., et al. (2025). Associations among sleep quality, sleep duration, and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70096

Vancouver

Chen C.-L, Zhang M.-Y, Wang Z.-L, Deng J.-H, Bao Y.-P, Shi J, et al. Associations among sleep quality, sleep duration, and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.70096. PMID: 40145494.

BibTeX

@article{chen2025-40145494,
  author  = {Chen, Chun-Lin and Zhang, Miao-Yu and Wang, Zhi-Lin and Deng, Jia-Hui and Bao, Yan-Ping and Shi, Jie and Lu, Lin and Shi, Le},
  title   = {{Associations among sleep quality, sleep duration, and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.70096},
  pmid    = {40145494},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70096}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 80/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 45 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 80 of 100. Total 80 of 100.45 of the 56 points we could judge = 80 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 45 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 80 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question (from PubMed type “Systematic Review”)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 14,997 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40145494)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 45 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 45 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 80 out of 100.
Total 80 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “apnea”

196 studies in the library carry the topic tag “apnea”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 196 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →