Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Long-term cohort studies

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Accurate dementia risk prediction is challenging, and may be facilitated by better use of imaging and genetic data, including their complex interactions. We explored using deep survival neural networks to integrate these multi-modal, high-dimensional data. We included 3521 Rotterdam Study participants, 6340 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, with follow-up clinical diagnosis for dementia, and used 504 samples from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) as an external validation. Genetic data included APOE-ε4 status and 76 additional SNPs. We developed models combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Cox Proportional Hazards (CPH) models and provided post-hoc explanations. Our models outperformed CPH models including age, sex, and genetic inputs in both Rotterdam Study and ADNI by C-index of 0.88/0.63 V.S. 0.85/0.58, p-value of 0.02/0.002. Although their performance did not surpass CPH models also included MRI markers (0.89/0.66), additional predictability was obtained in age-stratified prediction in ADNI. Incorporating CNN image features in CPH models further increased performance to highest C-index of 0.90/0.69. Age and image had the highest importance in prediction, with age, image and genetic features showing the strongest interactions. Our approach indicates that imaging and genetic data can be feasibly integrated for dementia risk prediction, with informative extraction, reliable explanations and potential predictive gains.

Key findings

Why it matters

Deep survival neural networks combining imaging and genetic data predicted dementia risk better than models using only age, sex, and genetics, but did not outperform models that also included MRI markers. The authors conclude that imaging and genetic data can feasibly be integrated for risk prediction, which is about prediction rather than treatment or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 43 of 100.43 of 100 points earned57 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific Reports)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Scientific Reports: journal h-index 463 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 Design recorded as “post-hoc analysis”, which our rubric does not rank (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 3,521 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Gennady V. Roshchupkin: h-index 25 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Erasmus MC: institution h-index 1,321 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41041540)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Yu, J., Rosbergen, M. T., Wolters, F. J., Bron, E. E., Vernooij, M. W., Ikram, M. A., et al. (2026). Imaging-genetics-based dementia risk prediction using deep survival neural networks in the Rotterdam Study. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47047-y

Vancouver

Yu J, Rosbergen MT, Wolters FJ, Bron EE, Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, et al. Imaging-genetics-based dementia risk prediction using deep survival neural networks in the Rotterdam Study. Scientific Reports. 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-47047-y. PMID: 41041540.

BibTeX

@article{yu2026-41041540,
  author  = {Yu, Jing and Rosbergen, Mathijs T. and Wolters, Frank J. and Bron, Esther E. and Vernooij, Meike Willemijn and Ikram, M. Arfan and Roshchupkin, Gennady V.},
  title   = {{Imaging-genetics-based dementia risk prediction using deep survival neural networks in the Rotterdam Study}},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41598-026-47047-y},
  pmid    = {41041540},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47047-y}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Long-term cohort studies

Similar studies

More on Long-term cohort studies

See all studies in Long-term cohort studies →