Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

Background Cholinesterase inhibitors with additional nicotinic activity, such as galantamine, may be useful in PD patients with dementia (PDD) since stimulation of nicotinic receptors may prevent the down-regulation that is likely to accompany cholinesterase inhibition and facilitate dopamine release in the striatum. Methods Sixteen PDD patients (six female) with onset of cognitive impairment after at least one year with parkinsonism participated in this open-label trial of galantamine. Cognitive, psychiatric, and motor symptoms were assessed before and after 8 weeks of treatment with galantamine using unstructured clinical assessment as well as rating scales including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), clock drawing test, verbal fluency and selected items from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Low

This is a trial. In this open-label trial, sixteen patients with Parkinson's disease dementia received galantamine for 8 weeks and were assessed for cognitive, psychiatric, and motor symptoms. The small size and open-label design mean these preliminary results cannot establish whether galantamine is an effective treatment.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Aarsland, D., Hutchinson, M., & Larsen, J. P. (2003). Cognitive, psychiatric and motor response to galantamine in Parkinson's disease with dementia. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.949

Vancouver

Aarsland D, Hutchinson M, Larsen JP. Cognitive, psychiatric and motor response to galantamine in Parkinson's disease with dementia. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2003. doi:10.1002/gps.949. PMID: 14533126.

BibTeX

@article{aarsland2003-14533126,
  author  = {Aarsland, D. and Hutchinson, M. and Larsen, J. P.},
  title   = {{Cognitive, psychiatric and motor response to galantamine in Parkinson's disease with dementia}},
  journal = {International journal of geriatric psychiatry},
  year    = {2003},
  doi     = {10.1002/gps.949},
  pmid    = {14533126},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.949}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this open-label trial, sixteen patients with Parkinson's disease dementia received galantamine for 8 weeks and were assessed for cognitive, psychiatric, and motor symptoms. The small size and open-label design mean these preliminary results cannot establish whether galantamine is an effective treatment.

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 45 of 100.45 of 100 points earned55 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International journal of geriatric psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: journal h-index 190 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 Design recorded as “open-label trial”, which our rubric does not rank (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2003 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 222 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 8.9 citations a year over 25 year(s) since 2003
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 13.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 5 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 18 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author J. P. Larsen: h-index 12 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 New York University: institution h-index 1,612 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 14533126)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

5 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment from nearby years

Also tagged “lewy”

1,017 studies in the library carry the topic tag “lewy”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,017 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →