Home › Research › Cognitive tests and assessment
Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial
Spector A, Thorgrimsen L, Woods B, Royan L, Davies S, Butterworth M, Orrell M.. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2003-09-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Background A recent Cochrane review of reality orientation therapy identified the need for large, well-designed, multi-centre trials. Aims To test the hypothesis that cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for older people with dementia would benefit cognition and quality of life. Method A single-blind, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial recruited 201 older people with dementia.
Key findings
- Aims To test the hypothesis that cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for older people with dementia would benefit cognition and quality of life.
- Method A single-blind, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial recruited 201 older people with dementia.
- The main outcome measures were change in cognitive function and quality of life.
- An intention-to-treat analysis used analysis of covariance to control for potential variability in baseline measures.
Why it matters
This randomized controlled trial tested whether cognitive stimulation therapy for older people with dementia would benefit cognition and quality of life. The record does not state the trial's results, so no conclusion about its benefit can be drawn from this text.
Study details
- Study designrandomized controlled trial
- Participants201
- Evidence strengthHigh
How this study scored 73/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science) |
| Journal's citation record | 3 / 4 | The British Journal of Psychiatry: journal h-index 376 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 11 / 12 | A randomised controlled trial |
| Strength of evidence | 5 / 5 | Rated “high” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2003 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 201 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 2 / 2 | Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record) |
| Times cited | 6 / 7 | Cited 879 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 4 / 5 | 35.2 citations a year over 25 year(s) since 2003 |
| Impact for its field and year | 4 / 6 | Cited 14.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 3 / 6 | Cited by 26 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 3 / 4 | Cited 136 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Martin William Orrell: h-index 88 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | University College London: institution h-index 2,029 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12948999) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Total | 73 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1192/bjp.183.3.248
- PubMed: 12948999
- Original source →
- Free full text: The British Journal of Psychiatry →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Spector, A., Thorgrimsen, L., Woods, B., Royan, L., Davies, S., Butterworth, M., et al. (2003). Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.183.3.248
Vancouver
Spector A, Thorgrimsen L, Woods B, Royan L, Davies S, Butterworth M, et al. Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. 2003. doi:10.1192/bjp.183.3.248. PMID: 12948999.
BibTeX
@article{spector2003-12948999,
author = {Spector, A. and Thorgrimsen, L. and Woods, B. and Royan, L. and Davies, S. and Butterworth, M. and Orrell, M.},
title = {{Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial}},
journal = {The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science},
year = {2003},
doi = {10.1192/bjp.183.3.248},
pmid = {12948999},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.183.3.248}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
26 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.