Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background Cardiovascular risk factors and a history of vascular disease can increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). AD is less common in aspirin users than non-users, and there are plausible biological mechanisms whereby aspirin might slow the progression of either vascular or Alzheimer-type pathology. We assessed the benefits of aspirin in patients with AD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

AD2000 Collaborative Group, Bentham, P., Gray, R., Sellwood, E., Hills, R., Crome, P., et al. (2008). Aspirin in Alzheimer's disease (AD2000): a randomised open-label trial. The Lancet. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70293-4

Vancouver

AD2000 Collaborative Group, Bentham P, Gray R, Sellwood E, Hills R, Crome P, et al. Aspirin in Alzheimer's disease (AD2000): a randomised open-label trial. The Lancet. Neurology. 2008. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70293-4. PMID: 18068522.

BibTeX

@article{study2008-18068522,
  author  = {{AD2000 Collaborative Group} and Bentham, P. and Gray, R. and Sellwood, E. and Hills, R. and Crome, P. and Raftery, J.},
  title   = {{Aspirin in Alzheimer's disease (AD2000): a randomised open-label trial}},
  journal = {The Lancet. Neurology},
  year    = {2008},
  doi     = {10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70293-4},
  pmid    = {18068522},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70293-4}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This randomised trial assessed whether aspirin slows progression in people with Alzheimer's disease, based on the observation that Alzheimer's disease is less common in aspirin users. It tested aspirin as a possible treatment, not a cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 65/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 60 of the 93 points it could be judged on, which is 65 of 100. Total 65 of 100.60 of the 93 points we could judge = 65 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomized controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 60 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 65 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (The Lancet. Neurology)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 The Lancet Neurology: journal h-index 457 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomized controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2008 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 156 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 1 / 2 Randomized (as stated in the record)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 147 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 7.3 citations a year over 20 year(s) since 2008
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 6.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 8 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 12 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author AD Collaborative Group holds only 2 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 18068522)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 60 / 93 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 60 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 65 out of 100.
Total 65 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 17.

Later studies that cite this one

8 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Also tagged “placebo-controlled”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “placebo-controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →