Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background The Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT) was designed to address whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can prevent or delay the onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods ADAPT was a randomized, double-placebo-controlled, multicenter chemoprevention trial conducted at six U.S. dementia research clinics. At entry, participants were required to test "normal" on a battery of cognitive tests and to be age 70+ with a family history of Alzheimer-like dementia. Persons were randomly assigned to 200 mg b.i.d. celecoxib (Celebrex, Pfizer), 220 mg b.i.d. naproxen sodium (Aleve, Bayer), or placebo. The primary outcome measure was AD. Secondary outcome measures were cognitive decline and measures related to safety of the treatments when used long term. ADAPT was designed to detect a 30% reduction in AD incidence with 80% power. The estimated sample size requirement was 2,625. Results Enrollment began in March 2001 and ended in December 2004 when treatments were suspended because of concerns regarding cardiovascular safety of the treatments. Followup ranged from 1 to 46 months. The achieved enrollment was 2,528. Recruitment was achieved primarily via mailings to people aged 70+ living in the catchment areas of the six field sites.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

ADAPT Research Group, Meinert, C. L., McCaffrey, L. D., & Breitner, J. C. (2009). Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial: design, methods, and baseline results. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2008.09.004

Vancouver

ADAPT Research Group, Meinert CL, McCaffrey LD, Breitner JC. Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial: design, methods, and baseline results. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2008.09.004. PMID: 19328435.

BibTeX

@article{study2009-19328435,
  author  = {{ADAPT Research Group} and Meinert, C. L. and McCaffrey, L. D. and Breitner, J. C.},
  title   = {{Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial: design, methods, and baseline results}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association},
  year    = {2009},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.jalz.2008.09.004},
  pmid    = {19328435},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2008.09.004}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper describes the design of a prevention trial testing whether the anti-inflammatory drugs celecoxib or naproxen could prevent Alzheimer's disease in people aged 70 and older with a family history of dementia. The trial enrolled 2,528 participants but treatments were suspended early because of concerns about cardiovascular safety, so it did not provide answers about prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 59 of the 93 points it could be judged on, which is 63 of 100. Total 63 of 100.59 of the 93 points we could judge = 63 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size and effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 59 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 63 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2009 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 2 / 2 Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 99 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 5.2 citations a year over 19 year(s) since 2009
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 7.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 5 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author ADAPT Research Group holds only 2 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19328435)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 59 / 93 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 59 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 63 out of 100.
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

5 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Treatments

Also in Treatments

166 studies in the library are filed under Treatments with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Treatments hub.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →