Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Mild cognitive impairment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The retention rate for MLIP-CE was 90.2% (37/41). Mean participant age was 70.93 ± 6.91 years, 73.2% of participants were female, and mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 24.51 ± 2.87. Throughout the 24 weeks of the prescribed intervention, app usage remained consistently high, with over 92% of participants using the mini-program at least once a week and successfully completing corresponding health management tasks. In terms of average usage, cognitive training emerged as the most frequently used functional module (95.73%), closely followed by health education (95.02%). The health behavior levels of older adults with SCD, measured in terms of ability, opportunity, and motivation, were significantly increased relative to baseline (p < 0.001). Regarding cognitive function, Mini-Mental State Examination scores were significantly improved post-intervention, with a moderate effect size (Hedges' g = 0.60). These findings suggest that MLIP-CE, which was designed based on a theoretical framework, has potential for implementation, and support ongoing research into use of MLIP-CE for individuals at high risk of SCD or other dementia conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry with the registration number ChiCTR2200058665 on 13 April 2022.

Key findings

Why it matters

This feasibility study of a mobile-based multidomain lifestyle intervention in older adults with subjective cognitive decline found high retention and app usage, with significant improvement in health behaviors and Mini-Mental State Examination scores. As a small feasibility study, it supports further research but does not establish that the intervention prevents Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 38 of 100.38 of 100 points earned62 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC Geriatrics)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 BMC Geriatrics: journal h-index 153 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Hong Li: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Utah: institution h-index 1,238 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39833671)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Lin, R., Yan, Y., Chen, Z., Huang, C., Zhao, J., Chen, M., et al. (2025). A mobile-based multidomain lifestyle intervention using Cognitive Evergreenland for older adults with subjective cognitive decline: a feasibility study. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05684-4

Vancouver

Lin R, Yan Y, Chen Z, Huang C, Zhao J, Chen M, et al. A mobile-based multidomain lifestyle intervention using Cognitive Evergreenland for older adults with subjective cognitive decline: a feasibility study. BMC Geriatrics. 2025. doi:10.1186/s12877-025-05684-4. PMID: 39833671.

BibTeX

@article{lin2025-39833671,
  author  = {Lin, Rong and Yan, Yuanjiao and Chen, Zhili and Huang, Chenshan and Zhao, Junyu and Chen, Mingfeng and Li, Hong},
  title   = {{A mobile-based multidomain lifestyle intervention using Cognitive Evergreenland for older adults with subjective cognitive decline: a feasibility study}},
  journal = {BMC Geriatrics},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1186/s12877-025-05684-4},
  pmid    = {39833671},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05684-4}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment

Similar studies

More on Mild cognitive impairment

See all studies in Mild cognitive impairment →