Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Mild cognitive impairment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Early detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) offers a critical window for intervention before progression to dementia. This study presents a novel approach to MCI screening through multimodal behavioral analysis during the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), implementing a comprehensive data collection system using standard tablet devices. Our approach analyzes three behavioral dimensions: drawing trajectories, facial expressions, and hand motion patterns. We developed an integrated framework combining Convolutional Neural Networks with multi-head attention mechanisms for drawing analysis, alongside specialized feature extraction methods for facial and motion data. To effectively integrate these behavioral markers, we proposed a Higher-order Canonical Correlation Analysis (HCCA) algorithm that models complex relationships between modalities. In our primary study with 69 MCI participants and 133 age-matched controls, we identified distinct behavioral patterns: temporal drawing anomalies, altered facial behaviors including increased gaze variability, and distinctive motion patterns reflecting changes in movement stability. Our multimodal approach achieved an AUC of 0.92 (accuracy: 92.68%, sensitivity: 90.91%), with HCCA further improving performance to an AUC of 0.97. External validation with 76 additional participants demonstrated good generalizability (AUC: 0.86). These findings reveal how cognitive impairment manifests across multiple behavioral channels offer clinicians precise, interpretable quantification of cognitive function for more accurate MCI screening.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study used multimodal behavioral analysis during the Clock Drawing Test to screen for mild cognitive impairment, achieving high accuracy in distinguishing participants from controls. It is about improving screening and does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 36 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 38 of 100. Total 38 of 100.36 of the 96 points we could judge = 38 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 36 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies: journal h-index 92 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Chicago: institution h-index 1,769 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 36 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 36 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100.
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Fan, L., Zhao, J., Wu, Y., Wang, F., Wang, X., & Lin, T. (2025). Beyond the Clock: Exploring Multimodal Behavior Markers of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults during Clock Drawing Test. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1145/3770684

Vancouver

Fan L, Zhao J, Wu Y, Wang F, Wang X, Lin T. Beyond the Clock: Exploring Multimodal Behavior Markers of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults during Clock Drawing Test. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 2025. doi:10.1145/3770684.

BibTeX

@article{fan2025-2981775f,
  author  = {Fan, Lingjie and Zhao, Junhan and Wu, Yongji and Wang, Fengyi and Wang, Xiyue and Lin, Tao},
  title   = {{Beyond the Clock: Exploring Multimodal Behavior Markers of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults during Clock Drawing Test}},
  journal = {Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1145/3770684},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3770684}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Mild cognitive impairment

See all studies in Mild cognitive impairment →