Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 34 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Multidomain lifestyle interventions can improve cognitive function and mobile health technologies can deliver cost-effective interventions. We developed the smartphone app, Cognitive Evergreenland, to promote cognitive health in people at high risk of dementia, and assessed its usability. Functional modules were selected using a behaviour change wheel (BCW) theory-based method. Target behaviors were assessed by literature review and focus group interviews. Findings were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework, identifying behaviors requiring change and linking them to intervention functions. Behavior change techniques (BCTs) considered likely to be effective were selected, and corresponding COM-B components and BCTs translated into application functionalities. The app was optimized based on user feedback collected by interview and evaluated using "Mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire for Standalone mHealth Apps (Patient Version)". Promoting adherence to multidomain lifestyle interventions required changes in physical and psychological abilities, reflective and automatic motivation reinforcement, and social and physical opportunities provision. We identified seven key intervention functions and selected 16 BCTs. Finalized Cognitive Evergreenland modules included health education, cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, interactive communication, health diary, functional assessment, and personal profile. Target users indicated overall satisfaction with usability. BCW theory application facilitated Cognitive Evergreenland development.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Lin, R., Yan, Y., Huang, C., Zhao, J., Chen, M., & Li, H. (2025). Development and usability of the “Cognitive Evergreenland” app to engage individuals at high risk of dementia in lifestyle interventions. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92535-2

Vancouver

Lin R, Yan Y, Huang C, Zhao J, Chen M, Li H. Development and usability of the “Cognitive Evergreenland” app to engage individuals at high risk of dementia in lifestyle interventions. Scientific Reports. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-92535-2. PMID: 40089518.

BibTeX

@article{lin2025-40089518,
  author  = {Lin, Rong and Yan, Yuanjiao and Huang, Chenshan and Zhao, Junyu and Chen, Mingfeng and Li, Hong},
  title   = {{Development and usability of the “Cognitive Evergreenland” app to engage individuals at high risk of dementia in lifestyle interventions}},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41598-025-92535-2},
  pmid    = {40089518},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92535-2}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This describes the development and usability testing of a smartphone app intended to support lifestyle interventions in people at high risk of dementia. It reports user satisfaction with usability, not whether the app prevents cognitive decline or dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 34/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 34 of 100.34 of 100 points earned66 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific Reports)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Scientific Reports: journal h-index 463 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Hong Li: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Fujian Medical University: institution h-index 277 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40089518)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 34 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention trials

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →