Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have sentence comprehension difficulty. We examined the hypothesis that both grammatical and resource factors contribute to their impaired sentence comprehension with a traditional, off-line sentence comprehension task, and an on-line sentence processing procedure that minimizes task-related resources. This was investigated in subgroups of FTD patients with Progressive Non-fluent Aphasia (PNFA; n = 5) who have effortful speech; non-aphasic patients with an executive deficit (EXEC; n = 8); and Semantic Dementia (SD; n = 3) patients with poor single word comprehension. The results were correlated with measures of executive resources. We found that PNFA patients are significantly impaired in their off-line sentence comprehension, and that their performance correlated with auditory-verbal short-term memory. PNFA patients also demonstrated a pattern of slowed processing for the on-line sentence measure. This is consistent with the hypothesis that information relevant for constructing sentence representations during comprehension degrades in working memory as it is activated over an abnormally slowed time course. EXEC patients had modest off-line sentence comprehension difficulty, and this correlated with performance on measures of working memory, planning, and inhibitory control. On-line processing in EXEC patients demonstrated their insensitivity to sentence-based information. This raises the possibility that a limitation in material-neutral executive resources not dedicated to grammatical processing may play a role in their sentence comprehension deficit. SD patients' pattern of on-line sentence comprehension paralleled control subjects' performance. We conclude that grammatical and executive components both contribute to sentence comprehension, and that the profile of sentence comprehension difficulty varies across FTD subgroups depending on the sentence processing component that is impaired.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that patients with frontotemporal dementia have sentence comprehension difficulty related to both grammatical and executive factors, in small subgroups of patients. It concerns understanding language problems in frontotemporal dementia, not treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 40 of 100.40 of 100 points earned60 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Cortex: journal h-index 202 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2005 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 72 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.1 citations a year over 23 year(s) since 2005
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 7 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Peachie Moore: h-index 32 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Pennsylvania: institution h-index 1,859 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 16353366)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Grossman, M., Rhee, J., & Moore, P. (2005). Sentence processing in frontotemporal dementia. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70295-8

Vancouver

Grossman M, Rhee J, Moore P. Sentence processing in frontotemporal dementia. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior. 2005. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70295-8. PMID: 16353366.

BibTeX

@article{grossman2005-16353366,
  author  = {Grossman, M. and Rhee, J. and Moore, P.},
  title   = {{Sentence processing in frontotemporal dementia}},
  journal = {Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior},
  year    = {2005},
  doi     = {10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70295-8},
  pmid    = {16353366},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70295-8}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 13.

Later studies that cite this one

7 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →