Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Mild cognitive impairment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Statistical analysis revealed a trend toward more impaired prefrontal FC with declining cognitive function. Prediction models were built by combining features of prefrontal FC and cognitive scale performance and applying machine learning models, The models showed generally satisfactory abilities to differentiate among the three groups, especially those employing linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, and support vector machine. Accuracies of 92.0 % for MCI vs. NC, 80.0 % for MCI vs. SCD, and 76.1 % for SCD vs. NC were achieved, and the highest AUC values were 97.0 % (95 % CI: 94.6 %-99.3 %) for MCI vs. NC, 87.0 % (95 % CI: 81.5 %-92.5 %) for MCI vs. SCD, and 79.2 % (95 % CI: 71.0 %-87.3 %) for SCD vs. NC. The developed screening method based on fNIRS and machine learning has the potential to predict early-stage cognitive impairment based on prefrontal FC data collected during cognitive scale-induced activation.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Pu, Z., Huang, H., Li, M., Li, H., Shen, X., Du, L., et al. (2025). Screening tools for subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment based on task-state prefrontal functional connectivity: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121130

Vancouver

Pu Z, Huang H, Li M, Li H, Shen X, Du L, et al. Screening tools for subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment based on task-state prefrontal functional connectivity: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. NeuroImage. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121130. PMID: 40058532.

BibTeX

@article{pu2025-40058532,
  author  = {Pu, Zhengping and Huang, Hongna and Li, Man and Li, Hongyan and Shen, Xiaoyan and Du, Lizhao and Wu, Qingfeng and Fang, Xiaomei and others},
  title   = {{Screening tools for subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment based on task-state prefrontal functional connectivity: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study}},
  journal = {NeuroImage},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121130},
  pmid    = {40058532},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121130}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy and machine learning, this study built models that differentiated mild cognitive impairment, subjective cognitive decline and normal cognition with accuracies from 76.1% to 92.0%. This is a potential screening method for early-stage cognitive impairment, not a treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 45 of 100.45 of 100 points earned55 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (NeuroImage)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 NeuroImage: journal h-index 523 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 16 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 5.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 10.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 16 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Donghong Cui: h-index 27 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Shanghai Jiao Tong University: institution h-index 975 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40058532)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 17.

Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Mild cognitive impairment

See all studies in Mild cognitive impairment →