Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 29 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by amyloid-β deposition, tau pathology, synaptic dysfunction, neuronal injury and cerebral atrophy. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has transformed AD evaluation by enabling in-vivo visualization of molecular and metabolic abnormalities. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET evaluates cerebral glucose metabolism, amyloid PET identifies fibrillar amyloid-β and tau PET provides information about neurofibrillary pathology. This review examines diagnostic and prognostic applications of PET in AD, particularly in mild cognitive impairment, atypical dementia, differential diagnosis, disease staging, progression prediction and treatment selection. Evidence indicates that amyloid PET is highly useful for establishing amyloid pathology, whereas tau PET is more closely associated with disease stage and clinical severity. FDG PET remains valuable for identifying patterns of neurodegeneration and distinguishing AD from other dementias. With the emergence of disease-modifying anti-amyloid therapies, molecular confirmation has become increasingly relevant to treatment decisions. Important limitations include cost, availability, radiation exposure, tracer-specific limitations, mixed pathology and interpretation variability. Future integration of PET with MRI, blood biomarkers and artificial intelligence may improve individualized diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic monitoring.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Khatoon, F., Musa, Y., Balouch, Z., Maqsood, S. M., Yousuf, K., & Aftab, M. (2026). PET Imaging in Alzheimer Disease: Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications. International Journal of Clinical and Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.66590/ijcmr2026030107

Vancouver

Khatoon F, Musa Y, Balouch Z, Maqsood SM, Yousuf K, Aftab M. PET Imaging in Alzheimer Disease: Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications. International Journal of Clinical and Medical Research. 2026. doi:10.66590/ijcmr2026030107.

BibTeX

@article{khatoon2026-05f30011,
  author  = {Khatoon, Fahmida and Musa, Yassir and Balouch, Zahid and Maqsood, Syeda Misba and Yousuf, Komal and Aftab, Muzammil},
  title   = {{PET Imaging in Alzheimer Disease: Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications}},
  journal = {International Journal of Clinical and Medical Research},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.66590/ijcmr2026030107},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.66590/ijcmr2026030107}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review describes how amyloid PET establishes amyloid pathology, tau PET relates to disease stage and severity, and FDG PET identifies neurodegeneration patterns. It covers diagnostic and prognostic uses of PET, including treatment selection, but does not itself test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 29/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 28 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 29 of 100. Total 29 of 100.28 of the 96 points we could judge = 29 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 28 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 29 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International Journal of Clinical and Medical Research)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 International Journal of Clinical and Medical Research: journal h-index 0 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Muzammil Aftab holds only 8 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Iqra University: institution h-index 140 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 28 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 28 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 29 out of 100.
Total 29 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “machine”

834 studies in the library carry the topic tag “machine”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 834 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →