Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Neighborhood disadvantage is a risk factor for dementia, but the mechanisms involved are not well understood. In this study, we explored the relationship between neighborhood deprivation and whole-brain cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in 132 older adults without history of clinical stroke or dementia. Participants underwent brain MRI and venipuncture. Relative neighborhood deprivation was quantified using the Area Deprivation Index. Spontaneous CVR was calculated as the percent change in resting cerebral blood flow per unit change in end-tidal CO 2 . Greater neighborhood deprivation was associated with lower whole-brain CVR when adjusted for age and sex ( p = 0.027). Further adjustment for APOE ε4 carrier status, vascular risk factors, and plasma Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarker p-tau217 did not alter the results. These findings show that older adults in more disadvantaged environments exhibit reduced cerebrovascular function, independent of traditional vascular risk and AD-related pathology. However, further investigation with more diverse samples and a life-course model is warranted to better understand these microvascular differences.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Law, K. W., Engstrom, A. C., Lohman, T., Johnson, M., Kapoor, A., Alitin, J. P. M., et al. (2026). Older adults in more disadvantaged neighborhoods exhibit brain vascular dysfunction. Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2026.100562

Vancouver

Law KW, Engstrom AC, Lohman T, Johnson M, Kapoor A, Alitin JPM, et al. Older adults in more disadvantaged neighborhoods exhibit brain vascular dysfunction. Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.cccb.2026.100562.

BibTeX

@article{law2026-75b8b974,
  author  = {Law, Kevin W. and Engstrom, Allison C and Lohman, Trevor and Johnson, Melanie and Kapoor, Arunima and Alitin, John Paul M and Wang, Danny J.J. and Gaubert, Aimée and others},
  title   = {{Older adults in more disadvantaged neighborhoods exhibit brain vascular dysfunction}},
  journal = {Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.cccb.2026.100562},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2026.100562}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 132 older adults without stroke or dementia, greater neighborhood deprivation was linked to lower whole-brain cerebrovascular reactivity, even after adjusting for vascular risk factors and an Alzheimer's blood marker. The authors note that more diverse samples and a life-course approach are needed, and the study does not test any treatment.

Study details

How this study scored 31/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 31 of 100.31 of 100 points earned69 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior: journal h-index 19 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Daniel A. Nation: h-index 41 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Southern California: institution h-index 1,521 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 31 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “small”

900 studies in the library carry the topic tag “small”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 900 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →