Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 54 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Since older adults spend significant time in their neighborhood environment, environmental factors such as neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, high racial segregation, low healthy food availability, low access to recreation, and minimal social engagement may have adverse effects on cognitive function and increase susceptibility to dementia. DNA methylation, which is associated with neighborhood characteristics as well as cognitive function and white matter hyperintensity (WMH), may act as a mediator between neighborhood characteristics and neurocognitive outcomes. In this study, we examined whether DNA methylation in peripheral blood leukocytes mediates the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and cognitive function (N = 542) or WMH (N = 466) in older African American (AA) participants without preliminary evidence of dementia from the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA). For a 1-mile buffer around a participant's residence, each additional fast food destination or unfavorable food store with alcohol per square mile was nominally associated with a 0.05 (95%CI: 0.01, 0.09) and a 0.04 (0.00, 0.08) second improvement in visual conceptual tracking score, respectively. Also, each additional alcohol drinking place per square mile was nominally associated with a 0.62 (0.05, 1.19) word increase in delayed recall score, indicating better memory function (all p < 0.05). Neighborhood characteristics were not associated with WMH. We did not find evidence that DNA methylation mediates the observed associations between neighborhood characteristics and cognitive function. The presence of fast food destinations and unfavorable food stores with alcohol was associated cognitive measures, possibly due to greater social interaction provided in these venues. However, replication of these findings is necessary. Further examination of the potential pathways between the neighborhood environment and cognitive function/WMH may allow the development of potential behavioral, infrastructural, and pharmaceutical interventions to facilitate aging in place and healthy brain aging in older adults, especially in marginal populations that are most at risk.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 542 older African American adults without preliminary evidence of dementia, having more fast food outlets, alcohol-selling food stores or bars near home was nominally linked to slightly better scores on two cognitive tests. Neighbourhood features were not linked to white matter changes on brain scans, and blood DNA methylation did not explain the links. The authors say replication is necessary, and the study looked at no dementia outcome, so it says nothing about preventing or treating Alzheimer's.

Study details

How this study scored 54/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 39 of the 72 points it could be judged on, which is 54 of 100. Total 54 of 100.39 of the 72 points we could judge = 54 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here and still being cited, so those were left out: it earned 39 of the 72 points we could judge it on, which is 54 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC medicine)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 BMC Medicine: journal h-index 259 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 542 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 Citation count not trusted: 42 of 48 library studies citing it were published more than a year before it - a sign OpenAlex merged several works under this DOI — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Library citations not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Jennifer A. Smith: h-index 98 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Michigan: institution h-index 2,222 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39800688)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 39 / 72 Scored on 15 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 39 of the 72 points we could judge it on is 54 out of 100.
Total 54 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Chaar Dima, L., Le, T., Kari, M., Jiacong, D., Opsasnick Lauren, A., Ratliff Scott, M., et al. (2025). Neighborhood environment associations with cognitive function and structural brain measures in older African Americans. BMC medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03845-7

Vancouver

Chaar Dima L, Le T, Kari M, Jiacong D, Opsasnick Lauren A, Ratliff Scott M, et al. Neighborhood environment associations with cognitive function and structural brain measures in older African Americans. BMC medicine. 2025. doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03845-7. PMID: 39800688.

BibTeX

@article{chaardima2025-39800688,
  author  = {Chaar Dima, L. and Le, Tu and Kari, Moore and Jiacong, Du and Opsasnick Lauren, A. and Ratliff Scott, M. and Mosley Thomas, H. and Kardia Sharon L, R. and others},
  title   = {{Neighborhood environment associations with cognitive function and structural brain measures in older African Americans}},
  journal = {BMC medicine},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1186/s12916-024-03845-7},
  pmid    = {39800688},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03845-7}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 25.

Later studies that cite this one

48 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Risk factors

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →