Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 69 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Objectives To provide risk estimates of dementia and Alzheimer disease as a function of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes and to assess the proportion of dementia that is attributable to the APOE genotypes. Design Case-control study nested in a population-based cohort study with a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.1 (0.9) years. Setting General population in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Participants A total of 134 patients with incident dementia and a random sample of 997 nondemented control subjects. No participant had dementia at baseline. Main outcome measures Odds ratios for dementia and Alzheimer disease, the fraction of dementia attributable to the APOE epsilon4 allele, and the proportion of the variance in age at the onset of dementia explained by the APOE genotypes. Results Persons with the epsilon4/4 genotype had a more than 10-fold higher risk of dementia (odds ratio, 11.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.6-35.2), and subjects with the epsilon3/4 genotype had a 1.7-fold increased risk of dementia (95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.9) as compared with persons with the epsilon3/3 genotype. The proportion of patients with dementia that is attributable to the epsilon4 allele was estimated to be 20%. The APOE genotypes explained up to 10% of the variance in age at the onset of dementia. The association between the epsilon4 allele and dementia was strongest in the youngest age category and in those with a family history of dementia. Conclusions The APOE genotype is an important determinant of the risk of dementia. At a population level, however, other factors than the APOE genotype may play an important role in the cause of dementia.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this population-based study, people with the APOE epsilon4/4 genotype had more than a 10-fold higher risk of dementia and those with epsilon3/4 had a 1.7-fold higher risk compared with epsilon3/3. About 20% of dementia cases were estimated to be attributable to the epsilon4 allele, and APOE genotypes explained up to 10% of the variance in age at dementia onset, which informs risk understanding rather than offering a treatment.

Study details

How this study scored 69/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 4 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 69 of 100.69 of 100 points earned31 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Archives of neurology)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Archives of Neurology: journal h-index 353 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1998 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 2 / 4 134 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 401 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 13.4 citations a year over 30 year(s) since 1998
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 8.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 4 / 6 Cited by 33 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 19 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Cornelia M. van Duijn: h-index 237 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Erasmus MC: institution h-index 1,321 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 9678314)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 69 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — Unpaywall lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Slooter, A. J., Cruts, M., Kalmijn, S., Hofman, A., Breteler, M. M., Van Broeckhoven, C., et al. (1998). Risk estimates of dementia by apolipoprotein E genotypes from a population-based incidence study: the Rotterdam Study. Archives of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.55.7.964

Vancouver

Slooter AJ, Cruts M, Kalmijn S, Hofman A, Breteler MM, Van Broeckhoven C, et al. Risk estimates of dementia by apolipoprotein E genotypes from a population-based incidence study: the Rotterdam Study. Archives of neurology. 1998. doi:10.1001/archneur.55.7.964. PMID: 9678314.

BibTeX

@article{slooter1998-9678314,
  author  = {Slooter, A. J. and Cruts, M. and Kalmijn, S. and Hofman, A. and Breteler, M. M. and Van Broeckhoven, C. and van Duijn, C. M.},
  title   = {{Risk estimates of dementia by apolipoprotein E genotypes from a population-based incidence study: the Rotterdam Study}},
  journal = {Archives of neurology},
  year    = {1998},
  doi     = {10.1001/archneur.55.7.964},
  pmid    = {9678314},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.55.7.964}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

33 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Genetics

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →