Home › Research › Risk factors
Navigating Life After Dementia Diagnosis: Questions, Challenges, and Support Needs Among Dementia Dyads
Britt KC, Harb A, Bailey B, Saffold B, Luo X, Brown RT, Huang B.. medRxiv, 2026-10-09
Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology
Background Older adults living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) and their care partners face substantial daily challenges that evolve with disease progression and extend far beyond the clinical setting, including symptom management, care coordination, healthcare navigation, and planning for future care needs. Understanding these challenges is essential for developing innovative solutions to provide ongoing and targeted support. In this study, we explored questions, challenges, and support needs dementia dyads experienced following diagnosis to inform the development of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based chatbot designed to provide ongoing support for dementia dyads. Methods We recruited 11 community-dwelling dyads comprising persons living with MCI or mild AD/ADRD and their care partners, one additional care partner, and 12 dementia care experts from academic medical centers, clinics, and aging organizations in the U.S. We conducted semi-structured interviews and analyzed them using conventional content analysis. Results Participants described interconnected questions, challenges, and support needs that evolved while navigating life with MCI or AD/ADRD. Questions centered around day-to-day care management, medical concerns, behavioral symptom management, diagnosis and prognosis, safety, and resources and services. Challenges included care partner overwhelm, limited dementia knowledge, condition-related uncertainty, healthcare system navigation difficulties, financial constraints, and technology-related barriers. Participants identified needs for ongoing education, personalized care planning, resource navigation, logistical support and follow-up, culturally responsive care, and social and emotional support. Conclusions Dementia dyads experience substantial informational, emotional, and practical support needs in the early stages of MCI and AD/ADRD. Findings suggest that post-diagnostic support should extend beyond information provision alone to provide ongoing, personalized, and practical guidance that helps dyads navigate changing needs, resources, and everyday dementia care. These findings are informing the development of an AI-based chatbot intended to complement existing dementia care by extending access to education, practical guidance, and resource navigation between clinical encounters.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Britt, K. C., Harb, A., Bailey, B., Saffold, B., Luo, X., Brown, R. T., et al. (2026). Navigating Life After Dementia Diagnosis: Questions, Challenges, and Support Needs Among Dementia Dyads. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.07.26364992
Vancouver
Britt KC, Harb A, Bailey B, Saffold B, Luo X, Brown RT, et al. Navigating Life After Dementia Diagnosis: Questions, Challenges, and Support Needs Among Dementia Dyads. medRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.10.07.26364992.
BibTeX
@article{britt2026-927d909f,
author = {Britt, K. C. and Harb, A. and Bailey, B. and Saffold, B. and Luo, X. and Brown, R. T. and Huang, B.},
title = {{Navigating Life After Dementia Diagnosis: Questions, Challenges, and Support Needs Among Dementia Dyads}},
journal = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.07.26364992},
url = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.07.26364992}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results Participants described interconnected questions, challenges, and support needs that evolved while navigating life with MCI or AD/ADRD.
- Findings suggest that post-diagnostic support should extend beyond information provision alone to provide ongoing, personalized, and practical guidance that helps dyads navigate changing needs, resources, and everyday dementia care.
- These findings are informing the development of an AI-based chatbot intended to complement existing dementia care by extending access to education, practical guidance, and resource navigation between clinical encounters.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Risk factors, ranked →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 16/100
Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 4 / 10 | Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 13 / 62 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100. |
| Total | 21 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Risk factors
Also tagged “caregiver”
195 studies in the library carry the topic tag “caregiver”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 195 tagged studies.