Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 57 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

A total of 110 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [4.6] years; 68 female [61.8%]) were randomized to the experimental group (n = 55) and the sham group (n = 55) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 6 weeks after the intervention, compared with the sham group, the experimental group showed a lower PSQI score (between-group mean difference, -3.1 [95% CI, -4.2 to -2.1]; P < .001) and a higher MoCA score (between-group mean difference, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.7-2.1]; P < .001). The per-protocol dataset analyses and 12-week follow-up showed similar results. The generalized estimated equation model revealed an interaction effect between the PSQI score (mean difference, -2.1 [95% CI, -3.1 to -0.1]; P < .001) and the MoCA total score (mean difference, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.1-1.6]; P = .01). There were 7 nonserious, unrelated adverse events (experimental group: 2; sham group: 5) with no significant difference between the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the findings suggest that 1-Hz rTMS enhanced the clinical benefits of tai chi chuan in improving sleep quality and cognitive function among older adults with sleep disorders and MCI, which may be related to alterations in neural plasticity. These findings provide novel data on nonpharmacologic strategies for the rehabilitation of sleep disorders and may delay or even prevent MCI. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200063274.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Liu, Z., Zhang, L., Bai, L., Guo, Z., Gao, J., Lin, Y., et al. (2025). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Tai Chi Chuan for Older Adults With Sleep Disorders and Mild Cognitive Impairment. JAMA Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54307

Vancouver

Liu Z, Zhang L, Bai L, Guo Z, Gao J, Lin Y, et al. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Tai Chi Chuan for Older Adults With Sleep Disorders and Mild Cognitive Impairment. JAMA Network Open. 2025. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54307. PMID: 39792383.

BibTeX

@article{liu2025-39792383,
  author  = {Liu, Zhizhen and Zhang, Lin and Bai, Linxin and Guo, Zhenxing and Gao, Jiahui and Lin, Yongsheng and Zhou, Yongjin and Lai, Jinghui and others},
  title   = {{Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Tai Chi Chuan for Older Adults With Sleep Disorders and Mild Cognitive Impairment}},
  journal = {JAMA Network Open},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54307},
  pmid    = {39792383},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54307}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this trial of 110 older adults with sleep disorders and mild cognitive impairment, combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with tai chi improved sleep quality and cognitive test scores compared to a sham group. These findings suggest a non-drug approach may help delay or prevent mild cognitive impairment, though longer-term benefits are not yet known.

Study details

How this study scored 57/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 57 of 100.57 of 100 points earned43 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA Network Open)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 JAMA Network Open: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 55 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 1 / 2 Randomized (as stated in the record)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 30 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 10.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 9.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 30 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Lidian Chen: h-index 54 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Shenzhen University: institution h-index 530 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39792383)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 57 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “controlled”

1,116 studies in the library carry the topic tag “controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,116 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →