Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

Introduction With the global increase in dementia due to demographic aging, dementia not only affects those diagnosed but also their primary caregivers, often leading to significant caregiver burden. This study aimed to synthesize existing interventions to understand their effectiveness in reducing psychological distress - specifically anxiety, depression, and subjective well-being (SWB) - among dementia caregivers. Methods We conducted a multilevel meta-analysis of 175 studies involving 342 intervention treatments on caregivers. Interventions were categorized into various psychological outcomes. The effects of demographic characteristics on intervention effectiveness were also analyzed using multilevel meta-regression. Results Interventions generally showed a significant reduction in anxiety and depression with varied effects on SWB. Training of the care recipient showed the largest observed effect on SWB, although this estimate is based on only 10 observations and should be regarded as promising rather than definitive. CBT also produced a robust positive effect. Younger, male, and non-spousal caregivers tended to experience greater reductions in anxiety and depression compared to older, female, or spousal caregivers. Conclusion These findings highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to caregiver characteristics and outcome type. While interventions broadly reduce caregiver distress, the degree of benefit varies, indicating that personalized approaches may yield the best results. We also emphasize the need for rigorous methodology (e.g., handling nonindependence and publication bias) in future caregiver intervention research.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Moderate

This is a pooled review. This meta-analysis of 175 studies found that caregiver interventions generally reduced anxiety and depression, with varied effects on subjective well-being. Its stated limit: Pooled effect sizes are not given in the abstract; broad heterogeneity of intervention types; authors flag publication bias and non-independence concerns in the underlying literature.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Lian, L., Li, E., Yu, Q., Huang, L., Jin, Y., Bian, H., et al. (2025). Meta-Analysis Reveals Consistently Positive Effects of Dementia Caregiver Interventions on Psychological Distress. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1159/000546707

Vancouver

Lian L, Li E, Yu Q, Huang L, Jin Y, Bian H, et al. Meta-Analysis Reveals Consistently Positive Effects of Dementia Caregiver Interventions on Psychological Distress. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. 2025. doi:10.1159/000546707. PMID: 40550226.

BibTeX

@article{lian2025-40550226,
  author  = {Lian, L. and Li, E. and Yu, Q. and Huang, L. and Jin, Y. and Bian, H. and Yu, S. and Yu, M.},
  title   = {{Meta-Analysis Reveals Consistently Positive Effects of Dementia Caregiver Interventions on Psychological Distress}},
  journal = {Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1159/000546707},
  pmid    = {40550226},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1159/000546707}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This meta-analysis of 175 studies found that caregiver interventions generally reduced anxiety and depression, with varied effects on subjective well-being. Younger, male, and non-spousal caregivers tended to show greater reductions in anxiety and depression.

Study details

Limitations

Pooled effect sizes are not given in the abstract; broad heterogeneity of intervention types; authors flag publication bias and non-independence concerns in the underlying literature.

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 40 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 41 of 100. Total 41 of 100.40 of the 98 points we could judge = 41 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 40 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders: journal h-index 149 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomization is not credited here
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Miao Yu: h-index 19 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine: institution h-index 175 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40550226)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 40 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 40 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100.
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — Unpaywall lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Caregiving from nearby years

Also tagged “nursing”

995 studies in the library carry the topic tag “nursing”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 995 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →