Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

We observed no mediation of individual risk factors in the effect of the interventions on dementia incidence. The interventions slightly lowered only blood pressure, but this did not translate into an effect on dementia incidence. In older populations, multidomain interventions may not sufficiently affect dementia risk factors to lower dementia incidence, particularly in settings where cardiovascular risk factor management is well implemented. HIGHLIGHTS: There is no mediating role of risk factor change in the effects of multidomain interventions on dementia incidence in two large dementia prevention randomized controlled trials. The lack of effect of the interventions on risk factors explains the absence of impact on dementia. Counteracting mediators do not explain the lack of effect of the interventions on dementia. A small effect of the interventions on blood pressure did not translate into a lower dementia incidence.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: High

The record lists 1,679 participants. In these two large prevention trials, the interventions did not lower dementia incidence, and changes in individual risk factors did not explain the results. The interventions slightly lowered only blood pressure, but this did not translate into less dementia.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Hoevenaar‐Blom, M. P., Shourik, J., van Dalen, J. W., van Gool, W. A., Andrieu, S., Richard, E., et al. (2025). Mediation of modifiable risk factors in two multidomain dementia prevention trials. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14557

Vancouver

Hoevenaar‐Blom MP, Shourik J, van Dalen JW, van Gool WA, Andrieu S, Richard E, et al. Mediation of modifiable risk factors in two multidomain dementia prevention trials. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.14557. PMID: 39868821.

BibTeX

@article{hoevenaarblom2025-39868821,
  author  = {Hoevenaar‐Blom, Marieke P. and Shourik, Jason and van Dalen, Jan Willem and van Gool, Willem A. and Andrieu, Sandrine and Richard, Edo and Coley, Nicola and van Charante, Eric Moll and others},
  title   = {{Mediation of modifiable risk factors in two multidomain dementia prevention trials}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.14557},
  pmid    = {39868821},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14557}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In these two large prevention trials, the interventions did not lower dementia incidence, and changes in individual risk factors did not explain the results. The interventions slightly lowered only blood pressure, but this did not translate into less dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 45 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 47 of 100. Total 47 of 100.45 of the 96 points we could judge = 47 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 45 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,679 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Inserm: institution h-index 1,988 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 12 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39868821)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 45 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 45 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100.
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention trials from nearby years

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,223 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,223 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →