Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 79 out of 100. How common it is

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with an increased risk of dementia. Mean ALDS scores measured during follow-up did not differ between groups (85·7 [SD 6·8] in the intervention group and 85·7 [7·1] in the control group; adjusted mean difference -0·02, 95% CI -0·38 to 0·42; p=0·93). 309 (16%) of 1885 participants died in the intervention group, compared with 269 (16%) of 1634 participants in the control group (HR 0·98, 95% CI 0·80-1·18; p=0·81). Interpretation A nurse-led, multidomain intervention did not result in a reduced incidence of all-cause dementia in an unselected population of older people.

Key findings

Why it matters

This randomised controlled trial found that a nurse-led, multidomain vascular care intervention did not reduce the incidence of all-cause dementia in an unselected population of older people. The intervention did not work for preventing dementia in this trial.

Study details

How this study scored 79/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 10 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 4 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 79 of 100.79 of 100 points earned21 not earned

Published in a top-tier journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 10 / 10 Tier 1 — top-tier general journal (Lancet (London, England))
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 The Lancet: journal h-index 1,205 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2016 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 3,526 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 607 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 50.6 citations a year over 12 year(s) since 2016
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 40.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 4 / 6 Cited by 68 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 165 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Willem A. van Gool: h-index 70 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Radboud University Nijmegen: institution h-index 1,143 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 27474376)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 79 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Moll van Charante, E. P., Richard, E., Eurelings, L. S., van Dalen, J. W., Ligthart, S. A., van Bussel, E. F., et al. (2016). Effectiveness of a 6-year multidomain vascular care intervention to prevent dementia (preDIVA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30950-3

Vancouver

Moll van Charante EP, Richard E, Eurelings LS, van Dalen JW, Ligthart SA, van Bussel EF, et al. Effectiveness of a 6-year multidomain vascular care intervention to prevent dementia (preDIVA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2016. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30950-3. PMID: 27474376.

BibTeX

@article{mollvancharante2016-27474376,
  author  = {Moll van Charante, E. P. and Richard, E. and Eurelings, L. S. and van Dalen, J. W. and Ligthart, S. A. and van Bussel, E. F. and Hoevenaar-Blom, M. P. and Vermeulen, M. and others},
  title   = {{Effectiveness of a 6-year multidomain vascular care intervention to prevent dementia (preDIVA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial}},
  journal = {Lancet (London, England)},
  year    = {2016},
  doi     = {10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30950-3},
  pmid    = {27474376},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30950-3}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

68 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in How common it is

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →