Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 69 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Genetics and APOE

Both intervention and control groups showed cognitive improvement over 24 weeks, with greater gains in the intervention arm. Relative intervention efficacy (RIE) increased with higher genetic risk, being most pronounced among APOE ε4 carriers and individuals with high PRS. When both factors were considered jointly, APOE ε4 carriers with high PRS exhibited the largest RIE (β = 7.54, SE = 2.59, p = 0.005), driven by markedly greater improvement in the intervention group. The secondary outcomes did not show as consistent results as RBANS total index. These findings suggest that MCI individuals who are APOE ε4 carriers with high PRS may benefit most from multidomain interventions. These results support the complementary use of PRS and APOE status for identifying high-risk subgroups most likely to benefit from multidomain interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05023057. Registered on 26 August 2021.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 69/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 41 of the 59 points it could be judged on, which is 69 of 100. Total 69 of 100.41 of the 59 points we could judge = 69 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size and effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 41 of the 59 points we could judge it on, which is 69 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer's research & therapy)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41388319)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 41 / 59 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 41 of the 59 points we could judge it on is 69 out of 100.
Total 69 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Hwang, J., Moon, S. Y., Lee, H., Lee, J., Park, Y. K., Jeong, J. H., et al. (2025). Polygenicity and APOE ε4 shape response to intervention in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer's research & therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01907-3

Vancouver

Hwang J, Moon SY, Lee H, Lee J, Park YK, Jeong JH, et al. Polygenicity and APOE ε4 shape response to intervention in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2025. doi:10.1186/s13195-025-01907-3. PMID: 41388319.

BibTeX

@article{hwang2025-41388319,
  author  = {Hwang, Jiyun and Moon, So Young and Lee, Harim and Lee, Jaejin and Park, Yoo Kyoung and Jeong, Jee Hyang and Hong, Chang Hyung and Jung, Jiwoo and others},
  title   = {{Polygenicity and APOE ε4 shape response to intervention in mild cognitive impairment}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's research \& therapy},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1186/s13195-025-01907-3},
  pmid    = {41388319},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01907-3}
}

Related studies in Prevention trials

Also tagged “genetics”

346 studies in the library carry the topic tag “genetics”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 346 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →