Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

This study classified preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) using cognitive screening, neighborhood deprivation via the area deprivation index (ADI), and sociodemographic and genetic risk factors. Additionally, it compared the predictive accuracy of multiple machine learning algorithms and examined model performance with two bootstrapping procedures. Data were drawn from a longitudinal cohort that required participants to be age 65 or older, cognitively normal at baseline, and active drivers, defined as taking at least one trip a week. Naturalistic driving data were collected using a commercial datalogger. Biomarker positivity was determined via amyloid pathology using cerebrospinal fluid and positron emission tomography imaging. ADI was captured based on geocoding latitude and longitude to derive a national ranking for the specific location (home or unique destination). Machine learning algorithms classified preclinical AD. Each individual model's predictive ability was confirmed in a 20% testing dataset with 100 rounds of resampling with and without replacement. Among 292 participants (n = 2,792 observations), including ADI of trip destinations, participants' home ADI, and frequency of trips to the same ADI led to a slight but notable improvement in predicting preclinical AD. The ensemble model demonstrated superior predictive performance, highlighting the potential of integrating multiple models for early AD detection. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating socioeconomic and environmental variables, such as neighborhood deprivation, in predicting preclinical AD. Addressing socioeconomic disparities through public health strategies is crucial for mitigating AD risk and enhancing the quality of life for older adults.

Key findings

Why it matters

Using cognitive screening, neighborhood disadvantage, and genetic and social factors, machine learning models slightly improved prediction of preclinical Alzheimer's disease, with a combined model performing best. This is about early detection, not treatment or cure, and the improvement from neighborhood factors was described as slight.

Study details

How this study scored 65/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 47 of the 72 points it could be judged on, which is 65 of 100. Total 65 of 100.47 of the 72 points we could judge = 65 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here and still being cited, so those were left out: it earned 47 of the 72 points we could judge it on, which is 65 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 The Journals of Gerontology Series B: journal h-index 225 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 2,792 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 Citation count not trusted: 12 of 31 library studies citing it were published more than a year before it - a sign OpenAlex merged several works under this DOI — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Library citations not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Ganesh Muneshwar Babulal: h-index 31 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Washington University in St. Louis: institution h-index 1,947 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39969227)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 47 / 72 Scored on 15 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 47 of the 72 points we could judge it on is 65 out of 100.
Total 65 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Noor, A.-H., Mahmoud, A., Brown David, C., Pooja, L., Hannes, D., Carr David, B., et al. (2025). Integrating Machine Learning and Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors for the Early Detection of Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf023

Vancouver

Noor A.-H, Mahmoud A, Brown David C, Pooja L, Hannes D, Carr David B, et al. Integrating Machine Learning and Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors for the Early Detection of Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences. 2025. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaf023. PMID: 39969227.

BibTeX

@article{noor2025-39969227,
  author  = {Noor, Al-Hammadi and Mahmoud, Abouelyazid and Brown David, C. and Pooja, Lalwani and Hannes, Devos and Carr David, B. and Babulal Ganesh, M.},
  title   = {{Integrating Machine Learning and Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors for the Early Detection of Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease}},
  journal = {The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/geronb/gbaf023},
  pmid    = {39969227},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf023}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

31 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →