Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Accurate differentiation of Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and healthy control (HC) is critical for early diagnosis and intervention of brain disorders. This study introduces a deep learning framework that leverages electroencephalography (EEG)-derived multiband functional connectivity (FC) features. Multiband Morlet wavelet mutual information (MMMIFC) was utilized to generate high-resolution FC matrices across 1-20 Hz, which were subsequently processed by a 3D convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) based on a modified VGG architecture. The proposed model achieved classification accuracies of 90.77 % for AD vs HC and 90.38 % for FTD vs HC, with sensitivity and specificity of 88.89 % and 93.10 % for AD vs HC, and 86.96 % and 93.10 % for FTD vs HC, respectively. Beyond classification performance, the analysis identified distinct EEG-based biomarkers within the default mode network. In AD analysis, global efficiency, diffusion efficiency, and clustering coefficient were consistently reduced in the delta and theta bands, reflecting disrupted low-frequency network integration and the theta band presents the most prominent group differences between AD and HC. In FTD analysis, graph theory metrics were also reduced in the delta and theta bands, with the delta band showing the most pronounced group differences compared to HC.

Key findings

Why it matters

A deep learning framework using EEG functional connectivity achieved about 90% accuracy in distinguishing Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia from healthy controls. This is a diagnostic classification study and does not provide a treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 36 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 38 of 100. Total 38 of 100.36 of the 96 points we could judge = 38 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 36 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Computers in Biology and Medicine)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Computers in Biology and Medicine: journal h-index 189 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 The University of Queensland: institution h-index 1,516 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40902468)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 36 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 36 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100.
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Shen, M., Wen, P. P., Song, B., & Li, Y. (2025). Muti-band Morlet mutual information functional connectivity for classifying Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia with a deep learning technique. Computers in Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111041

Vancouver

Shen M, Wen PP, Song B, Li Y. Muti-band Morlet mutual information functional connectivity for classifying Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia with a deep learning technique. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111041. PMID: 40902468.

BibTeX

@article{shen2025-40902468,
  author  = {Shen, Mingkan and Wen, Peng Paul and Song, Bo and Li, Yan},
  title   = {{Muti-band Morlet mutual information functional connectivity for classifying Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia with a deep learning technique}},
  journal = {Computers in Biology and Medicine},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111041},
  pmid    = {40902468},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111041}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →