Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

The model outperformed conventional ones, with an out-of-bag R2 of 74.8%. Key findings showed the normalized difference vegetation index as the most influential environmental factor in 15.1% of US counties, lack of leisure time physical activity in 12.7%, binge drinking in 9.1%, and mobile homes as the main socioeconomic factor in 13.3% of US counties. Spatial machine learning analyses suggest that AD dementia prevalence could be impacted by county-specific targeted interventions that improve green space, reduce air pollution and support greater access to physical activity.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Mollalo, A., Grekousis, G., Benitez, A., Florez, H., Neelon, B., Lenert, L. A., et al. (2024). Factors associated with Alzheimer's Disease Dementia prevalence in the United States: A county-level spatial machine learning analysis. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.16.24310529

Vancouver

Mollalo A, Grekousis G, Benitez A, Florez H, Neelon B, Lenert LA, et al. Factors associated with Alzheimer's Disease Dementia prevalence in the United States: A county-level spatial machine learning analysis. 2024. doi:10.1101/2024.07.16.24310529.

BibTeX

@article{mollalo2024-58e54ddd,
  author = {Mollalo, Abolfazl and Grekousis, George and Benitez, Andreana and Florez, Hermes and Neelon, Brian and Lenert, Leslie A and Alekseyenko, Alexander},
  title  = {{Factors associated with Alzheimer's Disease Dementia prevalence in the United States: A county-level spatial machine learning analysis}},
  year   = {2024},
  doi    = {10.1101/2024.07.16.24310529},
  url    = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.16.24310529}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no journal, so the citation leaves it out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This county-level analysis found that green space, lack of leisure-time physical activity, binge drinking and mobile homes were among the factors most linked to Alzheimer's disease dementia prevalence across U.S. counties. It does not test a treatment or cure, but it suggests that county-specific efforts to improve green space, reduce air pollution and support physical activity could be studied for their impact on dementia prevalence.

Study details

How this study scored 33/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 30 of the 90 points it could be judged on, which is 33 of 100. Total 33 of 100.30 of the 90 points we could judge = 33 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record and impact for its field and year, so those were left out: it earned 30 of the 90 points we could judge it on, which is 33 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Not indexed)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Alexander V. Alekseyenko: h-index 38 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Sun Yat-sen University: institution h-index 851 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 30 / 90 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 30 of the 90 points we could judge it on is 33 out of 100.
Total 33 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “incidence”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “incidence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →