Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Lewy body dementia

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

A total of 110 patients were identified. Frequency of diagnostic criteria ranged from 89% (apathy; empathy loss) to 14.5% (dysexecutive profile), and 78 patients met at least four criteria. Mean survival time from symptom onset was 10.4 years and was not affected by the number and combination of core diagnostic criteria (P values ≥ 0.274). Our findings show that the requirements for the cognitive criterion are disproportionately restrictive, which may delay diagnosis and access to relevant treatments and therapies. HIGHLIGHTS: The comparative usefulness of core criteria for frontotemporal dementia diagnosis is unclear. We identified the most common profiles of core features at baseline. Most common feature profiles included apathy and/or empathy loss. Feature profiles were not predictive of survival. Cognitive criterion appears overly restrictive in its current form.

Key findings

Why it matters

Reviewing records of 110 patients, researchers found that the cognitive criterion for diagnosing behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia was met by only 14.5% of patients and appears overly restrictive, which may delay diagnosis and access to treatments. Survival time was not affected by the number or combination of core diagnostic criteria.

Study details

How this study scored 49/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 49 of 100.49 of 100 points earned51 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 110 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 10 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 6.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 10 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Rebekah M. Ahmed: h-index 37 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 The University of Sydney: institution h-index 1,466 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40820228)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 49 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Piguet, O., Clarke, A. J., Foxe, D., Tse, N. Y., Teng, C., Burrell, J. R., et al. (2025). Fourteen years later: Reviewing the diagnostic criteria for behavioral‐variant frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70604

Vancouver

Piguet O, Clarke AJ, Foxe D, Tse NY, Teng C, Burrell JR, et al. Fourteen years later: Reviewing the diagnostic criteria for behavioral‐variant frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.70604. PMID: 40820228.

BibTeX

@article{piguet2025-40820228,
  author  = {Piguet, Olivier and Clarke, Antonia Jean and Foxe, David and Tse, Nga Yan and Teng, Claris and Burrell, James R. and Cheung, Sau Chi and Carrick, James and others},
  title   = {{Fourteen years later: Reviewing the diagnostic criteria for behavioral‐variant frontotemporal dementia}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.70604},
  pmid    = {40820228},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70604}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Lewy body dementia

Also tagged “bodies”

1,017 studies in the library carry the topic tag “bodies”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,017 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Lewy body dementia

See all studies in Lewy body dementia →