Home › Research › Getting a diagnosis
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Andrés Santiago González Moreno. , 2013-05-22
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
We do not hold a plain-English summary of this study yet. Use the links to the original below for its abstract and findings.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Moreno, A. S. G. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Vancouver
Moreno ASG. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 2013. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.
BibTeX
@article{moreno2013-95316347,
author = {Moreno, Andrés Santiago González},
title = {{Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders}},
year = {2013},
doi = {10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no journal, so the citation leaves it out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Why it matters
The manual of diagnostic criteria for mental disorders, dementia among them. Standardising how conditions are defined and diagnosed supports consistent care and research, but does not treat or prevent Alzheimer's disease.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Getting a diagnosis →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 16/100
Report — not peer-reviewed. It scored 40 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for journal tier, study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 3 / 10 | Report — not peer-reviewed. No journal named, so it cannot be treated as peer-reviewed. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2013 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 7 / 7 | Cited 116,048 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 5 / 5 | 7,736.5 citations a year over 15 year(s) since 2013 |
| Impact for its field and year | 6 / 6 | Cited 1,774.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 5 / 6 | Cited by 187 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 4 / 4 | Cited 26,888 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Andrés Santiago González Moreno holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | University of Southern Denmark: institution h-index 692 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 38 / 96 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100. |
| Total | 40 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
- Original source →
- Free full text: Repositorio Institucional UPTC →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Later studies that cite this one
200 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.
Related studies in Getting a diagnosis
Also in Getting a diagnosis
141 studies in the library are filed under Getting a diagnosis with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Getting a diagnosis hub.