Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Among 90 participants included in the analyses, 34 had moderate to severe WMH. At the 18-month follow-up, a significant intervention-WMH interaction (p = 0.017) was found for the primary outcome. The intervention effect was significant in individuals with WMH (Z-score difference: +0.335, 95% confidence interval [CI]: +0.045 to +0.624), but not in individuals without WMH (Z-score difference: -0.121, 95% CI: -0.353 to +0.110). Older adults with type 2 diabetes and WMH may benefit from multidomain interventions. Further studies should be performed to validate this finding.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Sugimoto, T., Omura, T., Araki, A., Haneda, C., Honda, K., Kishi, M., et al. (2025). Differential effects of a multidomain intervention on cognitive decline in older adults with type 2 diabetes according to white matter hyperintensity status: A secondary analysis of the J‐ MIND ‐Diabetes. Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16605

Vancouver

Sugimoto T, Omura T, Araki A, Haneda C, Honda K, Kishi M, et al. Differential effects of a multidomain intervention on cognitive decline in older adults with type 2 diabetes according to white matter hyperintensity status: A secondary analysis of the J‐ MIND ‐Diabetes. Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism. 2025. doi:10.1111/dom.16605. PMID: 40654235.

BibTeX

@article{sugimoto2025-40654235,
  author  = {Sugimoto, Taiki and Omura, Takuya and Araki, Atsushi and Haneda, Chie and Honda, Keiko and Kishi, Minoru and Takahashi, Toshimasa and Toyoshima, Kenji and others},
  title   = {{Differential effects of a multidomain intervention on cognitive decline in older adults with type 2 diabetes according to white matter hyperintensity status: A secondary analysis of the J‐ MIND ‐Diabetes}},
  journal = {Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1111/dom.16605},
  pmid    = {40654235},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16605}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this secondary analysis of 90 older adults with type 2 diabetes, multidomain intervention improved cognition in those with moderate to severe white matter hyperintensities but not in those without. The authors call for further studies to validate the finding, so it does not yet establish a treatment or prevention for Alzheimer's.

Study details

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 45 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 47 of 100. Total 47 of 100.45 of the 96 points we could judge = 47 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 45 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism: journal h-index 186 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 154 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 3 / 3 University of Washington: institution h-index 3,540 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40654235)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 45 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 45 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100.
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention trials

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →