Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers

Plasma biomarkers have emerged as promising less invasive alternatives for Alzheimer's disease (AD) detection. However, the diagnostic performance of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) isoforms remains incompletely validated. In a cohort of 160 patients from a memory clinic, plasma levels of p-tau217, p-tau212, p-tau181, p-tau231, and BD-tau were measured using Single Molecule Array (Simoa) in-house assays, alongside NFL and GFAP. Subjects were classified using the Erlangen Score into Controls (n = 53), neurochemically possible AD (n = 27), and probable AD (n = 80). Plasma concentrations of all p-tau isoforms were significantly elevated in both Possible AD and Probable AD groups compared to Controls (p < 0.001). Notably, p-tau217 exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.954) and correlated with CSF classical biomarkers. A positive result for p-tau217 increases the probability of AD almost fivefold. Plasma p-tau217 reflects AD neurochemical changes and has high negative predictive value, supporting its use as a screening tool. However, moderate PPV suggests the need for confirmatory testing to ensure an accurate diagnosis.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Dulewicz, M., Kac, P. R., Ortiz, F. G., Karikari, T. K., Kulczyńska-Przybik, A., Mroczko, B., et al. (2025). Clinical Validation of Novel Immunoassays for Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217, 212, 181, 231, and Brain-Derived Tau Across the Biochemical Spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.70313

Vancouver

Dulewicz M, Kac PR, Ortiz FG, Karikari TK, Kulczyńska-Przybik A, Mroczko B, et al. Clinical Validation of Novel Immunoassays for Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217, 212, 181, 231, and Brain-Derived Tau Across the Biochemical Spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of neurochemistry. 2025. doi:10.1111/jnc.70313. PMID: 41321279.

BibTeX

@article{dulewicz2025-41321279,
  author  = {Dulewicz, Maciej and Kac, Przemysław Radosław and Ortiz, Fernando Gonzalez and Karikari, Thomas K and Kulczyńska-Przybik, Agnieszka and Mroczko, Barbara and Turton, Michael and Harrison, Peter and others},
  title   = {{Clinical Validation of Novel Immunoassays for Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217, 212, 181, 231, and Brain-Derived Tau Across the Biochemical Spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease}},
  journal = {Journal of neurochemistry},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1111/jnc.70313},
  pmid    = {41321279},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.70313}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 59/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 33 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 59 of 100. Total 59 of 100.33 of the 56 points we could judge = 59 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multicenter collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 33 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 59 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of neurochemistry)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 53 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41321279)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 33 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 33 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 59 out of 100.
Total 59 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “p-tau217”

692 studies in the library carry the topic tag “p-tau217”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 692 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →