Home › Research › Biomarkers
The cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta42/40 ratio in the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease from non-Alzheimer's dementia
Spies PE, Slats D, Sjögren JM, Kremer BP, Verhey FR, Rikkert MG, Verbeek MM.. Current Alzheimer research, 2010-08-01
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
Background Amyloid beta(40) (Abeta(40)) is the most abundant Abeta peptide in the brain. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) level of Abeta(40) might therefore be considered to most closely reflect the total Abeta load in the brain. Both in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and in normal aging the Abeta load in the brain has a large inter-individual variability. Relating Abeta(42) to Abeta(40) levels might consequently provide a more valid measure for reflecting the change in Abeta metabolism in dementia patients than the CSF Abeta(42) concentrations alone. This measure may also improve differential diagnosis between AD and other dementia syndromes, such as vascular dementia (VaD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of the CSF Abeta(42)/Abeta(40) ratio in differentiating AD from controls, VaD, DLB and FTD. Methods We analysed the CSF Abeta(42)/Abeta(40) ratio, phosphorylated tau(181) and total tau in 69 patients with AD, 26 patients with VaD, 16 patients with DLB, 27 patients with FTD, and 47 controls. Results Mean Abeta(40) levels were 2850 pg/ml in VaD and 2830 pg/ml in DLB patients, both significantly lower than in AD patients (3698 pg/ml; p<0.01). Abeta(40) levels in AD patients were not significantly different from those in controls (4035 pg/ml; p=0.384). The Abeta(42)/Abeta(40) ratio was significantly lower in AD patients than in all other groups (p <0.001, ANCOVA). Differentiating AD from VaD, DLB and non-AD dementia improved when the Abeta(42)/Abeta(40) ratio was used instead of Abeta(42) concentrations alone (p<0.01) The Abeta(42)/Abeta(40) ratio performed equally well as the combination of Abeta(42), phosphorylated tau(181) and total tau in differentiating AD from FTD and non-AD dementia. The diagnostic performance of the latter combination was not improved when the Abeta(42)/Abeta(40) ratio was used instead of Abeta(42) alone. Conclusion The CSF Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio improves differentiation of AD patients from VaD, DLB and non-AD dementia patients, when compared to Abeta42 alone, and is a more easily interpretable alternative to the combination of Abeta42, p-tau and t-tau when differentiating AD from either FTD or non-AD dementia.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Spies, P. E., Slats, D., Sjögren, J. M., Kremer, B. P., Verhey, F. R., Rikkert, M. G., et al. (2010). The cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta42/40 ratio in the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease from non-Alzheimer's dementia. Current Alzheimer research. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720510791383796
Vancouver
Spies PE, Slats D, Sjögren JM, Kremer BP, Verhey FR, Rikkert MG, et al. The cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta42/40 ratio in the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease from non-Alzheimer's dementia. Current Alzheimer research. 2010. doi:10.2174/156720510791383796. PMID: 20043812.
BibTeX
@article{spies2010-20043812,
author = {Spies, P. E. and Slats, D. and Sjögren, J. M. and Kremer, B. P. and Verhey, F. R. and Rikkert, M. G. and Verbeek, M. M.},
title = {{The cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta42/40 ratio in the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease from non-Alzheimer's dementia}},
journal = {Current Alzheimer research},
year = {2010},
doi = {10.2174/156720510791383796},
pmid = {20043812},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2174/156720510791383796}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results Mean Abeta(40) levels were 2850 pg/ml in VaD and 2830 pg/ml in DLB patients, both significantly lower than in AD patients (3698 pg/ml; p<0.01).
- Abeta(40) levels in AD patients were not significantly different from those in controls (4035 pg/ml; p=0.384).
- The Abeta(42)/Abeta(40) ratio was significantly lower in AD patients than in all other groups (p <0.001, ANCOVA).
- Conclusion The CSF Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio improves differentiation of AD patients from VaD, DLB and non-AD dementia patients, when compared to Abeta42 alone, and is a more easily interpretable alternative to the combination of Abeta42, p-tau and t-tau when differentiating AD from either FTD or non-AD dementia.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Participants69
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 43/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Current Alzheimer research) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2010 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 1 / 4 | 69 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 20043812) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 25 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100. |
| Total | 43 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also tagged “neurofilament”
697 studies in the library carry the topic tag “neurofilament”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 697 tagged studies.