Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 67 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers

Several promising plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease have been recently developed, but their neuropathological correlates have not yet been fully determined. To investigate and compare independent associations between multiple plasma biomarkers (p-tau181, p-tau217, p-tau231, Aβ42/40, GFAP, and NfL) and neuropathologic measures of amyloid and tau, we included 105 participants from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND) with antemortem plasma samples and a postmortem neuropathological exam, 48 of whom had longitudinal p-tau217 and p-tau181. When simultaneously including plaque and tangle loads, the Aβ42/40 ratio and p-tau231 were only associated with plaques (ρ Aβ42/40 [95%CI] = -0.53[-0.65, -0.35], ρ p-tau231 [95%CI] = 0.28[0.10, 0.43]), GFAP was only associated with tangles (ρ GFAP [95%CI] = 0.39[0.17, 0.57]), and p-tau217 and p-tau181 were associated with both plaques (ρ p-tau217 [95%CI] = 0.40[0.21, 0.56], ρ p-tau181 [95%CI] = 0.36[0.15, 0.50]) and tangles (ρ p-tau217 [95%CI] = 0.52[0.34, 0.66]; ρ p-tau181 [95%CI] = 0.36[0.17, 0.52]). A model combining p-tau217 and the Aβ42/40 ratio showed the highest accuracy for predicting the presence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathological change (ADNC, AUC[95%CI] = 0.89[0.82, 0.96]) and plaque load (R 2 = 0.55), while p-tau217 alone was optimal for predicting tangle load (R 2 = 0.45). Our results suggest that high-performing assays of plasma p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 might be an optimal combination to assess Alzheimer's-related pathology in vivo.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 67/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 39 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 67 of 100. Total 67 of 100.39 of the 58 points we could judge = 67 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 39 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 67 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (EMBO molecular medicine)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 105 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 36912178)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 39 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 39 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 67 out of 100.
Total 67 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Salvadó, G., Ossenkoppele, R., Ashton, N. J., Beach, T. G., Serrano, G. E., Reiman, E. M., et al. (2023). Specific associations between plasma biomarkers and postmortem amyloid plaque and tau tangle loads. EMBO molecular medicine. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202217123

Vancouver

Salvadó G, Ossenkoppele R, Ashton NJ, Beach TG, Serrano GE, Reiman EM, et al. Specific associations between plasma biomarkers and postmortem amyloid plaque and tau tangle loads. EMBO molecular medicine. 2023. doi:10.15252/emmm.202217123. PMID: 36912178.

BibTeX

@article{salvado2023-36912178,
  author  = {Salvadó, G. and Ossenkoppele, R. and Ashton, N. J. and Beach, T. G. and Serrano, G. E. and Reiman, E. M. and Zetterberg, H. and Mattsson-Carlgren, N. and others},
  title   = {{Specific associations between plasma biomarkers and postmortem amyloid plaque and tau tangle loads}},
  journal = {EMBO molecular medicine},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.15252/emmm.202217123},
  pmid    = {36912178},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202217123}
}

Related studies in Biomarkers

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →