Home › Research › Treatments
Benzodiazepine or Antipsychotic Use and Mortality Risk Among Patients With Dementia in Hospice Care
Gerlach LB, Zhang L, Kim HM, Teno J, Maust DT. JAMA Network Open, 2025-10-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Results Among 139 103 participants (105 372 [75.8%] female; mean [SD] age, 87.6 [7.7] years), 26 872 matched pairs were included in the benzodiazepine cohort and 10 240 in the antipsychotic cohort. Initiation of benzodiazepine use was associated with higher 180-day mortality compared with nonuse (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.38-1.44), as was initiation of antipsychotic use (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12-1.20). These findings were consistent across propensity score-weighted models and with greater cumulative exposure. Conclusions and relevance In this national case-control study of nursing home residents with ADRD receiving hospice care, initiation of benzodiazepine or antipsychotic use was associated with increased 180-day mortality. While these medications may provide symptom relief in appropriate clinical scenarios, their use is associated with substantial risks. These findings highlight the need for careful prescribing decisions and the development of dementia-specific hospice prescribing guidelines.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Gerlach, L. B., Zhang, L., Kim, H. M., Teno, J., & Maust, D. T. (2025). Benzodiazepine or Antipsychotic Use and Mortality Risk Among Patients With Dementia in Hospice Care. JAMA Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37551
Vancouver
Gerlach LB, Zhang L, Kim HM, Teno J, Maust DT. Benzodiazepine or Antipsychotic Use and Mortality Risk Among Patients With Dementia in Hospice Care. JAMA Network Open. 2025. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37551. PMID: 41085983.
BibTeX
@article{gerlach2025-41085983,
author = {Gerlach, L. B. and Zhang, L. and Kim, H. M. and Teno, J. and Maust, D. T.},
title = {{Benzodiazepine or Antipsychotic Use and Mortality Risk Among Patients With Dementia in Hospice Care}},
journal = {JAMA Network Open},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37551},
pmid = {41085983},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37551}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results Among 139 103 participants (105 372 [75.8%] female; mean [SD] age, 87.6 [7.7] years), 26 872 matched pairs were included in the benzodiazepine cohort and 10 240 in the antipsychotic cohort.
- Initiation of benzodiazepine use was associated with higher 180-day mortality compared with nonuse (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.38-1.44), as was initiation of antipsychotic use (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12-1.20).
- These findings were consistent across propensity score-weighted models and with greater cumulative exposure.
- Conclusions and relevance In this national case-control study of nursing home residents with ADRD receiving hospice care, initiation of benzodiazepine or antipsychotic use was associated with increased 180-day mortality.
- While these medications may provide symptom relief in appropriate clinical scenarios, their use is associated with substantial risks.
Why it matters
In this study of nursing home residents with dementia receiving hospice care, starting benzodiazepines or antipsychotics was associated with higher 180-day mortality. The authors call for careful prescribing decisions and dementia-specific hospice prescribing guidelines.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Study designcase-control
- Participants139,103
- Effect size180-day mortality HR 1.41 (95% CI 1.38-1.44) for benzodiazepines; HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.12-1.20) for antipsychotics
- Evidence strengthModerate
Limitations
Observational; drugs may be started because the person is deteriorating (confounding by indication); mortality is expected in hospice so the outcome is about timing, not whether death occurs; nursing home residents only.
How this study scored 60/100
Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a case-control study. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 59 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 60 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA Network Open) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | JAMA Network Open: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 6 / 12 | A case-control study |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 4 / 4 | 139,103 participants |
| Effect reported | 3 / 3 | Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 2 / 7 | Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 1 / 5 | 2.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 3 / 6 | Cited 3.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 2 / 4 | Last-listed author Donovan T. Maust: h-index 35 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | University of Michigan: institution h-index 2,240 (OpenAlex) |
| Multicenter collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41085983) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 59 / 98 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 59 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 60 out of 100. |
| Total | 60 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37551
- PubMed: 41085983
- Original source →
- Free full text: PubMed Central →
Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Related studies in Treatments
Also tagged “sedative-antipsychotic-harm-in-dementia”
4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “sedative-antipsychotic-harm-in-dementia”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.