Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 76 out of 100. Treatments

Reviewed as evidence on: Sedative/antipsychotic/mind-altering prescribing and falls, confusion, hospitalisation in dementia 4 studies (what the news said). Being listed means the study bears on the question, not that it agrees with the news.

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objective To investigate risks of multiple adverse outcomes associated with use of antipsychotics in people with dementia. Design Population based matched cohort study. Setting Linked primary care, hospital and mortality data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), England. Population Adults (≥50 years) with a diagnosis of dementia between 1 January 1998 and 31 May 2018 (n=173 910, 63.0% women). Each new antipsychotic user (n=35 339, 62.5% women) was matched with up to 15 non-users using incidence density sampling. Main outcome measures The main outcomes were stroke, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, fracture, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury, stratified by periods of antipsychotic use, with absolute risks calculated using cumulative incidence in antipsychotic users versus matched comparators. An unrelated (negative control) outcome of appendicitis and cholecystitis combined was also investigated to detect potential unmeasured confounding. Results Compared with non-use, any antipsychotic use was associated with increased risks of all outcomes, except ventricular arrhythmia. Current use (90 days after a prescription) was associated with elevated risks of pneumonia (hazard ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.10 to 2.28), acute kidney injury (1.72, 1.61 to 1.84), venous thromboembolism (1.62, 1.46 to 1.80), stroke (1.61, 1.52 to 1.71), fracture (1.43, 1.35 to 1.52), myocardial infarction (1.28, 1.15 to 1.42), and heart failure (1.27, 1.18 to 1.37). No increased risks were observed for the negative control outcome (appendicitis and cholecystitis). In the 90 days after drug initiation, the cumulative incidence of pneumonia among antipsychotic users was 4.48% (4.26% to 4.71%) versus 1.49% (1.45% to 1.53%) in the matched cohort of non-users (difference 2.99%, 95% CI 2.77% to 3.22%). Conclusions Antipsychotic use compared with non-use in adults with dementia was associated with increased risks of stroke, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, heart failure, fracture, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury, but not ventricular arrhythmia. The range of adverse outcomes was wider than previously highlighted in regulatory alerts, with the highest risks soon after initiation of treatment.

Key findings

Why it matters

This large cohort study found that antipsychotic use in people with dementia was associated with increased risks of many adverse outcomes, including pneumonia, acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, and stroke. These findings highlight the need for caution when prescribing antipsychotics in this population.

Study details

Limitations

Observational; despite matching and a negative-control outcome, residual confounding by indication (sicker patients receive antipsychotics) cannot be excluded; UK prescribing patterns.

How this study scored 76/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 74 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 76 of 100. Total 76 of 100.74 of the 98 points we could judge = 76 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 74 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 76 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (BMJ)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 BMJ: journal h-index 413 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 173,910 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 110 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 27.5 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 25.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 6 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 110 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Darren Mark Ashcroft: h-index 79 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Oxford: institution h-index 2,205 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38631737)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 74 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 74 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 76 out of 100.
Total 76 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 10 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Mok, P. L. H., Carr, M. J., Guthrie, B., Morales, D. R., Sheikh, A., Elliott, R. A., et al. (2024). Multiple adverse outcomes associated with antipsychotic use in people with dementia: population based matched cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-076268

Vancouver

Mok PLH, Carr MJ, Guthrie B, Morales DR, Sheikh A, Elliott RA, et al. Multiple adverse outcomes associated with antipsychotic use in people with dementia: population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2024. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-076268. PMID: 38631737.

BibTeX

@article{mok2024-38631737,
  author  = {Mok, P. L. H. and Carr, M. J. and Guthrie, B. and Morales, D. R. and Sheikh, A. and Elliott, R. A. and Camacho, E. M. and van Staa, T. and Avery, A. J. and Ashcroft, D. M.},
  title   = {{Multiple adverse outcomes associated with antipsychotic use in people with dementia: population based matched cohort study}},
  journal = {BMJ},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1136/bmj-2023-076268},
  pmid    = {38631737},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-076268}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

6 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “sedative-antipsychotic-harm-in-dementia”

4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “sedative-antipsychotic-harm-in-dementia”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →